The wording is rather confusing, but you can have tabs in a page stack, as long
as the tabs is the first item on the stack. What the designs mean is that you
can’t have a tabs element pushed on top of another page. What they don’t want
is to have a back button on the same screen as a tabs compon
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 15:32 -0600, Michael Spencer wrote:
> I was told by one of the the Ubuntu App Showdown judges that it would
> be best to use a page on the page stack instead of sheets. This would
> solve your problem, wouldn’t it?
As per the design guides, a page stack should not be used wit
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> My proposal here is to re-enable cron driven builds again.
Yes please!
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help : htt
hi,
On Do, 2013-11-28 at 17:01 +, Dave Morley wrote:
> On 28/11/13 12:13, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
> > the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
> > We also tested out some changes to the build policies
Hey guys,
While some part of the world is busy cooking turkey, other are working
and furiously getting new ubuntu touch images out!
We built images 33, 34 and 35!
Those contains some toolkit regression fixes, click packages to get less
failing tests as well as a lot of online accounts bug fix
On 28/11/13 12:13, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
> the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
> We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the proposed
> images that I would like to establish further.
>
On 11/27/2013 04:58 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi, On Mi, 2013-11-27 at 15:41 -0500, David Marceau wrote:
>
>> Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... update-initramfs:
>> Generating /boot/initrd.img-touch
> ...
>> Writing Boot Image /dev/disk/by-name/boot Press Return to
>> continue.
>
> wh
Hi,
As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the proposed
images that I would like to establish further.
Within the last weeks we raised the amount of built ima
Hello all,
I've been at this for a few days now. I seem to be stuck in a boot loop
error.
Here's what I've figured out. From looking at the last_kmsg, it seems that
my partitions may not be mounting correctly. Also, I know for sure they
aren't because the recovery.img (created by the same script a
On 27 November 2013 13:06, Ursula Junque wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Michał Sawicz <
> michal.saw...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> On 26.11.2013 02:44, Ursula Junque wrote:
>>
>>> If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
>>> Ubuntu packages, discouraging t
Hello,
On 26 November 2013 08:58, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Thomi Richards <
>> thomi.richa...@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ursula Junque wrote:
>>>
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
>>>
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.11.2013, 23:08 + schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
> On 27 November 2013 21:58, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > hi,
> > On Mi, 2013-11-27 at 15:41 -0500, David Marceau wrote:
> >
> >> Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
> >> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-touch
12 matches
Mail list logo
