updated merge-list

Hi folks, the merge-list [1] has been updated to match latest MoM-logs [2], and thus some merges that have been marked as fixed, are marked as new again. In numbers, our new merge-count went up from 95 to 208. Thanks to ajmitch, the database entries for the merge-list have now current dapper/u

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

Hi, first of all big thanks to Raphael for your great proposal! I'd also be more than happy to join the project. Am Montag 19 Dezember 2005 16:25 schrieb Asheesh Laroia: > Thanks. I agree with the Ubuntu side of this discussion that dealing with > non-distributed svn would be a pain; I don't ha

Packages still built against libstdc++5, i.e. FTBFS right now

Hi, anybody wants to look at outstanding/failing packages still built with libstdc++5? doko: do you have a list? or some nice cmd to get these? http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/libstdc++5-deps.txt Since the list is pretty small, and my time is limited atm :(, here's the old wiki with packages

Re: Status of {uni,multi}verse : 105 merges to do !

Hi, Am Mittwoch 04 Januar 2006 18:00 schrieb Stephan Hermann: > Hi Lucas, > > On Wednesday 04 January 2006 01:36, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I generated a status of universe and multiverse : > > http://ox.blop.info/bazaar/universe-versionslist.html.gz > > Packages with the same version

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

Hi, I'll just try to restart the discussion with a proposal: Currently I maintain one package (min12xxw, see [1]) for ubuntu, have filed an ITP (#334093) in debian but haven't tried hard enough to find a sponsor yet. Since this package is quite small one, it might be well suited to just try out

next MOTU-Meeting

Hi folks, there hasn't been a MOTU-Meeting for a very long time now, so let's do it again ;) There is no date and time set yet, I'd propose * Thu 12 Jan 06, 20.00 utc to start the discussion when the meeting should take place. The agenda is here, everybody who has motu-stuff that concern him/

Re: next MOTU-Meeting

Hi again ;) Am Montag 09 Januar 2006 15:34 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > There is no date and time set yet, I'd propose > * Thu 12 Jan 06, 20.00 utc > to start the discussion when the meeting should take place. Since nobody objected, I hereby announce the next meeting on Thu 12

Re: MOTU needed for merge/sync review !

Hi, Am Dienstag 17 Januar 2006 00:36 schrieb Yann Rouillard: > sync: > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/dosage/+bug/6503 > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gnome-backgrounds/+bug/6684 > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/6691 > https://launchpad.net/d

Re: MOTU needed for merge/sync review !

Hi, Am Dienstag 17 Januar 2006 00:50 schrieb Raphaël Pinson: > Hi, > > I also have two syncs to be achieved (both in multiverse) : > > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/unrar-nonfree/+bug/6664 This is no ubuntu-specific version, so it should get autosynced (in case we'll have any more

early UVF exception request: childsplay/childsplay-plugins

Hi, I'd like to request an exception for UVF for childsplay/childsplay-plugins. Rationale: The latest upstream release(s) not yet in ubuntu have been two bugfix releases, one made just today. That means, that the debian package won't be available before UVF. I don't want to diverge from debian

Re: The last couple of weeks in MOTU

Hi Stephan and list, Am Donnerstag 19 Januar 2006 13:11 schrieb Stephan Hermann: > And we should stop this nonsense about politics and flames and ranting > about others [...] +1 from me :) Cheers, Stefan. pgpTbsoCcCV64.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-

Re: early UVF exception request: childsplay/childsplay-plugins

Hi again, Am Mittwoch 18 Januar 2006 15:12 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > Hi, > > I'd like to request an exception for UVF for childsplay/childsplay-plugins. sorry for the noise... went in before UVF :). Cheers, Stefan. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ub

common packaging errors: changing the orig-tarball

Hi folks, One of things I see on revu quite often, is that the orig.tar.gz is changed while there is no need for it. Thus I did some comments on why you shouldn't and what to do in specific situations and wanted to post this here. Since I first asked Reinhard for proof-reading, he suggested to

Re: Dvdstyler and MOTU.

Hi, Am Montag 23 Januar 2006 18:08 schrieb George Farris: > Forwarded from ubuntu-devel > > If anyone from MOTU is listening it would be great to see this gtk app > in Universe. It is a very straight forward dvd creator and was featured > in Linux Journal last month, maybe the month before can't

next MOTU-meeting

Hi, proposed date for next motu-meeting is/was Thu 26. Jan 2006. However -meeting is busy at 20.00h UTC, so we'll need another time/day. Proposals? P.S.: Stephan, I'm working on the minutes for the last meeting, will be only a matter of days until I have them finished ;). Cheers, Stef

Re: next MOTU-meeting

Hi, Am Dienstag 24 Januar 2006 07:44 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > Hello, > > Am Montag, den 23.01.2006, 23:52 +0100 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > > proposed date for next motu-meeting is/was Thu 26. Jan 2006. However > > -meeting is busy at 20.00h UTC, so we'll need another

Re: next MOTU-meeting

Hi folks, Wed, Feb 1, 20.00h UTC is our next MOTU-meeting. Please add your topics to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings. Cheers, Stefan. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

UVF-exception: xpdf (security)

Hi, actually this is no UVF-exception, since it's a security update (no new upstream version, just one patch applied which fixes CVE-2006-0301). Maybe a sync could be requested with the next batch? (new xpdf 3.01-6 is in incoming atm) @crimsun: the only change done to xpdf in dapper is the chan

MOTU Meeting Minutes from 12 Jan 2006 (finally)

erse == People attending == * Stefan Potyra (sistpoty) * Daniel Holbach (dholbach) * Stephan Hermann (\sh) * Daniel Chen (crimsun) * Yann Rouillard (chninkel) * Raphael Pinson (raphink) * Jordan Mantha (LaserJock) * Jani Monoses (janimo) * Lucas Duailibe (lucasd) * Jonathan

Re: uvf exception: flashplugin-nonfree

Hi, --> moving to ubuntu-motu, since this is universe related. Am Dienstag 07 Februar 2006 15:40 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 07/02/06 at 10:44 -0300, Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto wrote: > > https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/292 > >14 The current version of fla

ocaml-transition

Hi List and Gauvain, I just noticed, that Gauvain filed some bugs w. debdiffs regarding ocaml-packages to malone, please don't upload these (blindly) yet. Unfortunately upstream version freeze hit us in the middle (or beginning?) of unstable's ocaml-transition to a new upstream version of the o

allegro transition - a kind of UVF exception (w.o. diffstat and changes)

Hi folks, for ubuntu dapper we have allegro4.1, while debian unstable has allegro4.2 (*and* allegro4.1). Difference is, that allegro4.2 provides liballegro4.2-dev whereas allegro4.1 provides liballegro-dev. Most of the rdepends in debian are already migrated (and the ones that were merged/sync

allegro transition - a kind of UVF exception

Hi folks, for ubuntu dapper we have allegro4.1, while debian unstable has allegro4.2 (*and* allegro4.1). Difference is, that allegro4.2 provides liballegro4.2-dev whereas allegro4.1 provides liballegro-dev. Most of the rdepends in debian are already migrated (and the ones that were merged/sync

UVF exception request: bum (2.1.4-1 to 2.1.5-1)

Hi, fixes: malone 29831. diffstat: >> diff -ruN bum-2.1.4 bum-2.1.5 | diffstat ChangeLog | 47 configure | 22 +- configure.in|6 data/bum.glade |2 debian/changelog|9 debian/copyright|2 debian/menu |2 intltool-extr

Re: new poll for MOTU work coordination

Hi, Am Samstag 18 Februar 2006 16:02 schrieb Benjamin Montgomery: > I liked the webpage and python scripts that sistpoty and \sh built for > the purpose of going through all of the MoM patches. If we could use > something similar to this, I think it would work well. Thanks :). > > Is there an a

Re: new poll for MOTU work coordination

Hi Reinhard, Am Sonntag 19 Februar 2006 18:41 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Currently: Imo we need at least track (somehow) for what packages syncs > > are requested (due too the fact, that syncs currently aren't processed). > > How about handling

Re: Open Sync Requests, Week 7 - more open syncs ;)

Am Sonntag 19 Februar 2006 20:03 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > Other syncs, taken from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/WorkInProgress: I guess we messed this up a little bit, since we wanted to list requested syncs in the "Done"-Section (and remove them, once they were synced)... so here some more...

UVF-exception request: gnomeicu

Hi Sebastien and List, current gnomeicu doesn't work any longer, since the icq-protocol was changed... (debian BTS: #352752). New package prepared at: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=1870 It works well under KDE ;) Changelog and diffstat attached. Cheers, Stefan. ChangeLog

Re: Repackaging a Debian package for use with Breezy

Hi again, (moving to ubuntu-motu list, as I think this is a better place for this topic). Am Montag 20 Februar 2006 21:00 schrieb Andrew Conkling: > Hey Stefan, thanks for the reply. > I didn't even think to check if it would be added; that's great to > hear! (It also spurs me on to get a few

Re: Open Sync Requests, Week 7 - much more open syncs ;)

Hi Stephan, Am Dienstag 21 Februar 2006 04:51 schrieb Stephan Hermann: > On Monday 20 February 2006 14:41, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > Am Montag, den 20.02.2006, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Stephan Hermann: > > > Please put it on the list for missing syncs. > > > > We have http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/SyncRe

Re: UVF Exception request for feed2imap 0.6-1 -> 0.7-1

Hi, Am Dienstag 21 Februar 2006 23:28 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Hi, > > - I am the upstream dev and the debian maintainer, so I know the package > quite well ;) - no open bugs in Debian > - 0.7 fixes several bugs that can be very annoying for the user > > Changelog: > feed2imap (0.7-1) unstable;

Re: Open Sync Requests, Week 7 - much more open syncs ;)

Hi Folks, Good news everyone: [00:06:23] Kamion | mdz: do you know if there is an ETA until syncs will be progressed again? [...] [00:10:04] sistpoty: elmo was asking for example syncs to test earlier, so I assume he's working on them. I have no ETA. [...] [00:36:31] mdz, Kamion: what about

Re: UVF exception request: librmagick-ruby 1.9.3-1 -> 1.10.0-2

Hi, Am Dienstag 21 Februar 2006 23:47 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Hi, > > - I am the Debian maintainer for this package. > - The package comes with a documentation that generates *a lot* of examples > at build time. So it works for sure. > > Debian changelog: > a few bug fixes, amongst them an FTBFS

Re: [UVF Exception Request] Wesnoth 1.1.1

Hi Raphael, Am Mittwoch 22 Februar 2006 16:56 schrieb Raphaël Pinson: > Hi MOTUs, > > I know it's very late for another UVF exception request, but I think this > one is very important. > > I tried to connect to the official Wesnoth game server with the current > Ubuntu version (1.1) and it said th

Re: UVF exception request for rake 0.6.2-2 -> 0.7.0-1

Hi, Am Mittwoch 22 Februar 2006 00:03 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Hi, > > Rake is make for ruby. Many Ruby developers use it, but only one package > (rails) depends on it. The package comes with a test suite. All tests pass. I'm a little bit undecided about it, as I don't see that (important) bugs

Re: UVF exception request for rake 0.6.2-2 -> 0.7.0-1

Hi again, Am Mittwoch 22 Februar 2006 18:16 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > It is the kind of package that makes developers' life hell if their > package's version is lagging behind. E.g: Developer A writes a Rakefile > which works with v. 0.7.0, but doesn't with v. 0.6.2. Developers B > (dapper user) o

Re: REVU and GPar2

Hi Francois and John, Francois, first off all: Thank you very much for informing us. Am Freitag 24 Februar 2006 10:57 schrieben Sie: > Hi, > > I don't know who to write to, but I've found your email on the reviewing > of gpar2 on REVU. ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com is a good place, I'll send the

Re: UVF execption request for BUM

Hi Fabio, Am Freitag 24 Februar 2006 15:27 schrieb Fabio Marzocca: > I have fixed this bug: https://launchpad.net/products/bum/+bug/29831 > on BootUp-Manager. Now version 2.1.5 is on debian repositories, but it > has been uploaded after UVF, so no synch has happened. Thanks for fixing ;) > > I h

Re: UVF for PyBlosxom

Hi Reinhard, Am Samstag 25 Februar 2006 15:50 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > This is http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0707 > > output of madison-lite: > >> madison-lite pyblosxom > > pyblosxom |1.3.2-2 | unstable | source, all > pyblosxom |1.2.1-2 |breezy

Re: MOTU: Anyone planning on packaging Cube?

Hi John, (following up to ubuntu-motu list) Am Samstag 25 Februar 2006 18:54 schrieb John Richard Moser: > Are any MOTU guys looking at games? Yes, we have the motu-games team. > I know Wesnoth and Adonthell are > out there, and I'm thinking about the ubuntu-gamers market. > > I just stumble

Re: MOTU: Anyone planning on packaging Cube?

Hi Zak, Am Sonntag 26 Februar 2006 08:56 schrieb Zak B. Elep: > Hi all! :-) > > On 2/26/06, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Digital Paintball (YES.) has GPL source code, not sure on data files. > > > > > > http://digitalpaint.planetquake

Re: REVU and GPar2

Hi Francois, Am Sonntag 26 Februar 2006 23:43 schrieb LESUEUR Francois: > Hi Stefan, > > I thank you very much for your interest. John and me have finally found > the necessary wisdom to fix things ;). From now, John is becoming an > officicial developper, and has downgraded his packages to be coh

Re: [Motu-reviewers] [REVU][COMMENT] for emacs-nxml-mode

Hi Marcin, first of all, I'm sorry for not giving a more detailed answer on revu; as I stated I was in a hurry and simply had no time to do so. Am Montag 27 Februar 2006 22:30 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Comment for package emacs-nxml-mode (not advocating) > Number of Advocates: 0 > Packages w

bum_2.1.5-1

Hi, bum_2.1.5-1 (no ubuntu specific changes present) UVF exception granted, just requested the sync. Thanks, Stefan. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

call for motu-meeting once again

Hi folks, sorry for completely forgetting about motu-meeting. The proposed date would have been today... To make it short: Poll is here[1], will start at 2006-04-03 00:00 UTC and end on 2006-08-03 00:00 UTC. Please add the desired options until 04/03. Also check the fridge[2], if #ubuntu-meet

Re: call for motu-meeting once again

Hi again ;) Am Mittwoch 01 März 2006 01:00 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > Poll is here[1], will start at 2006-04-03 00:00 UTC and end on 2006-08-03 > 00:00 UTC. Thanks to ajmitch, the poll dates are corrected now: Start: 2006-03-04 End: 2006-03-08 I needed to setup a new poll for this:

the merge-list reworked or how to manage workflow

Hi folks, the merge-list decided to go offline and replaced itself somehow with the MOTU-Worklist-tool. I had almost nothing to do with it ;). You can find the worklist at [1]. You'll need to file a bug with the title "accepted work"[2] to mark that you're working on a package and assign it to

next motu-meeting is: Fri, 10 March - 20.00 UTC

Hi folks, the voting in the catagory "best date for next motu-meeting" is over... and the winner with 2 votes and 0 counter-votes is: Fri, 10 March - 20.00 UTC The place will be (as always) #ubuntu-meeting on freenode. Please come to the meeting, if you're a MOTU, a MOTU-hopeful or generally i

minutes of motu-meeting 2006-10-3

Hi folks, minutes can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings/2006-03-10. Cheers, Stefan. Here a copy for convenience: MOTU meeting, 10. March 2006 Full log can be found at http://tiber.tauware.de/~sistpoty/motuminutes/motu_minutes_2006_03_10.log. People present * Stef

handling sync requests

Hi folks, Am Dienstag 21 Februar 2006 05:15 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > In case it will take a longer period of time, until sync requests are > progressed again, could we manually upload syncs? (imo we should be safe if > we use a version number right below unstable's version and tag t

Re: handling sync requests

Am Samstag 11 März 2006 01:18 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > Hi folks, > > Am Dienstag 21 Februar 2006 05:15 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > > In case it will take a longer period of time, until sync requests are > > progressed again, could we manually upload syncs? (imo we should be

Re: GTK Icon Cache and dh_iconcache usage

Hi, Am Dienstag 04 April 2006 21:29 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > In order to remedy that and use the *cool* characteristics of the Icon > Cache (~300k less memory usage by application and less seeking on the > disk), we wrote dh_iconcache which is in the archive. would it make sense to include this

Re: MOTU StrikeForce

Hi folks, hi Daniel, Am Sonntag 09 April 2006 12:56 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > Hello everybody > > I want to pull the concept of the MOTU StrikeForce out of the hat, > again. Those of us who are with us for a bit longer now, know that there > are stressful times, when the MOTU world is expected to

Re: Any word about this message from back in January.

Hi George, hi folks, Am Freitag 21 April 2006 00:26 schrieben Sie: > This package really works great and there are deb file on the site, it > would probably be trivial to build for Dapper. > > This package was featured in Linux Journal some time ago. Before Nick > (the I have a chip on my shoulde

Re: Etherape not installable.

Hi Sivan, Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 16:40 schrieb Sivan Greenberg: > Hi List, > > Trying to install etherape today on dapper, I got: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > etherape: Depends: libpcap0.7 but it is not installable > E: Broken packages > > > It appears that we do not

Re: No configure file?

Hi, Am Montag 12 Juni 2006 03:20 schrieb Robert Stoffers: > Hi, > > I've been messing around with building a package for Kdenlive > (http://kdenlive.sourceforge.net) however I'm getting an odd error about > the configure file missing. Attached below is the snipped output, attached > are the rules

Re: stats about number of needed merges

Hi, Am Montag 26 Juni 2006 10:40 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Hi, > > I did some stats about the number of packages which are older in Ubuntu > than in Debian (ie packages which need merges/syncs). Great job! > > Graph: > http://tiber.tauware.de/~lucas/mergescountdown/mergescountdown.png > Raw data

Re: Merges

Hi Dennis, Am Montag 03 Juli 2006 14:08 schrieb Dennis Kaarsemaker: > Hi MOTU, > > I've investigated a few outstanding merges, and there are quite a few > that can simply be synced (see below), can someone request a sync? I > also want to do some real merges, can someone sponsor them for me? Grea

Re: Merges

Am Montag 03 Juli 2006 15:09 schrieb Dennis Kaarsemaker: > On ma, 2006-07-03 at 14:39 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > > aclock.app, agenda.app, camera.app, cddb.bundle, cenon.app, > > > charmap.app, connect.app, cynthiune.app, displaycalibrator.app, > > > easydiff.

Re: Request for merge assistance.

Hi, Am Freitag 07 Juli 2006 13:49 schrieb Luke Yelavich: > Hi MOTUs > I am writing to request a favour from MOTUs out there. I have several > packages that have my name against them for merging, which I have just > about completed. A couple of which are syncs. Details of the packages > are below.

Re: Very old merges

Hi, Am Dienstag 18 Juli 2006 09:28 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > Hi, > > I've tried to take a different look at the list of needed merges. [0] > already shows the evolution of merges to do compared to Debian as of > today, and to snapshots of Debian in the past. > > One particularly interesting list o

Re: Very old merges

Hi again, Am Mittwoch 19 Juli 2006 14:45 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 19/07/06 at 13:41 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Dienstag 18 Juli 2006 09:28 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've tried to take a different

CommonPackagingMistakes updated -- notes about debian/copyright

Hi folks, I've finally updated the CommonPackagingMistakes section of the debian wiki. This time the topic is "Keeping the archive legal or the importance of debian/copyright". You can find it at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/CommonPackagingMistakes/DebianCopyright Please fix any error

Re: CommonPackagingMistakes updated -- notes about debian/copyright

Am Samstag 22 Juli 2006 23:47 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > I've finally updated the CommonPackagingMistakes section of the debian > wiki. lalala... s/debian/ubuntu/ ;) -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Re: CommonPackagingMistakes updated -- notes about debian/copyright

Hi Matthew, first of all thanks for your feedback, I'll overhaul the section. Am Sonntag 23 Juli 2006 03:03 schrieb Matthew Palmer: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:47:58PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > == Prelude == > > When reviewing packages, one major common error I

Re: CommonPackagingMistakes updated -- notes about debian/copyright

Hi Matthew, Am Montag 24 Juli 2006 02:36 schrieb Matthew Palmer: > On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Am Sonntag 23 Juli 2006 03:03 schrieb Matthew Palmer: > > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:47:58PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > > &

Re: More efficient package reviewing

Hi, Am Mittwoch 02 August 2006 21:58 schrieb Hubert Figuiere: > Hi, > > I would like to raise a few points/concerns about the package reviewing > process and the fact that the backlog of package to be review on REVU is > increasing every day. It is not to blame people, but I'm sure we can make > t

Re: More efficient package reviewing

Hi, Am Donnerstag 03 August 2006 00:09 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 02/08/06 at 15:58 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to raise a few points/concerns about the package reviewing > > process and the fact that the backlog of package to be review on REVU is > > increasing ev

Re: dvdstyler

Hi, Am Monday 28 August 2006 18:07 schrieb George Farris: > It would be great to see this GTK+ app in Universe. It is a very > straight forward dvd creator and was featured in Linux Journal a few > months ago. > > http://dvdstyler.sourceforge.net/ FWIW, it was once uploaded to breezy, but seems

Re: swt-gtk

Hi Andy, Am Sunday 03 September 2006 09:42 schrieb Andrew Price: > swt-gtk seems to have been removed from universe[1] but the newer > version in Debian[2] contains libraries required for other packages to > build, e.g. libswt-gtk-3.2-java is needed for the latest azureus package > (which can't be

Re: getting fixed version of mit-scheme into universe

Hi Chris, (CC to Adam for further comments). Am Freitag 06 Oktober 2006 06:14 schrieb Chris Hanson: > Hi, > > I'm the maintainer of the Debian mit-scheme packages, as well as the > upstream author. I've noticed that these packages haven't been updated > in universe for a long time, apparently be

Re: RFC: MOTU build farm project.

Hi Luke, Am Freitag 06 Oktober 2006 10:14 schrieb Luke Yelavich: > Hi all > As I am sure many of us are aware, it is important that we test build a > package before uploading/getting sponsored to upload a package to > universe. For the most part this is fine. We have chroots/pbuilders set > up for

downtime of tiber, our revu host

Hi folks, this saturday tiber and thus revu will be down for maintenance: We're finally dist-upgrading to dapper. If you have an tiber account and run some stuff that needs special care when dist-upgrading, please contact Reinhard (siretart) or me (sistpoty) via irc or via [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: rebuilds for libssl0.9.7 -> libssl0.9.8

Hi Kees, Am Freitag 13 Oktober 2006 00:45 schrieb Kees Cook: > Hi! I've been making my way through packages that were still linked > against libssl0.9.7, and have made some good progress (21 successfully > rebuilt). I've moved on to small code changes which is mostly the md5.h > includes, and mi

Re: motu-sru members

Hi, Am Dienstag 31 Oktober 2006 09:00 schrieb Jordan Mantha: > Daniel Holbach wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I think we should try to get the motu-sru team functional until Friday, > > so we have everything in place, even before UDS. :-) > > > > As process I propose, just following up to this

Re: [Fwd: Re: Stable Release Updates policy]

Hi, Am Dienstag 31 Oktober 2006 14:23 schrieb Hobbsee: > For FTBFS only bugs, with an eyeballable patch: > > Is it really necessary to go through with the 5 approvals, or 7 days, > whichever is longer? > > Clearly, we can test for buildability and installability - and even a > semi-working version

Re: motu-sru members

Hi, Am Dienstag 31 Oktober 2006 16:56 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > Hello Reinhard, > > Am Dienstag, den 31.10.2006, 16:10 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > > Will motu-sru > > take over the motu-uvf tasks, or will the 2 groups be kept seperate? > > Although their tasks are similar, we should probably

Re: Stable Release Updates policy

Hi Daniel, Am Dienstag 07 November 2006 04:31 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > Hello everybody, > > I'm going to add our process to > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates soon. Can you all check > that the 'proposal' part of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Processes/SRU > is ok? erm... looks like w

Re: Release Schedule, Herd 1 and "later" bugs

Hi, Am Mittwoch 15 November 2006 01:16 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: > Hi all, > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeistyReleaseSchedule lists the release schedule > for Feisty; it is back to the regular six-monthly schedule instead of > the compressed cycle we had for Edgy. > will universe be covered by the

Re: Release Schedule, Herd 1 and "later" bugs

Hi, Am Mittwoch 22 November 2006 09:24 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > Daniel Holbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > let's make Beta Freeze = Universe Freeze. What do you think? > > I think we should take the state of debian/unstable into consideration > of the freeze date. According the the latest d

News from MOTU-SRU, W47

Hi folks, the first two stable release update candidates have landed in -proposed, so please test: * dapper-proposed: + gcl, #43150 * edgy-proposed: + oprofile, #69455 in case you find any regressions with these, don't hesitate to append this to the given sru-request bugs. For the inte

MOTU-SRU-Report, w49

Hi folks, here's the MOTU-SRU-Report, W49: First of all, we've been doing some cleanup on our queue and rejected bugs that were not SRU-ready due to missing patches. Also we've been internally discussing two minor points in the current SRU policy: * the tags to use, once a package makes it in

Re: MOTU-SRU-Report, w49

Am Dienstag 05 Dezember 2006 22:02 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > > And now the list of bugs we handled/are handling: and another one... which wasn't on my all-knowing list: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gtetrinet/+bug/74133 * needs more votes. pgpUkfvZo4swt.pgp

Re: MOTU-SRU-Report, w49

Hi Daniel, Am Mittwoch 06 Dezember 2006 08:38 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > Hello Stefan, > > thanks a lot for the report. You guys do an awesome job! thanks. > > Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2006, 22:02 +0100 schrieb Stefan Potyra: > > And now the list of bugs we handled/are handl

Two sru's that need love

Hi folks, this time I've got two bugs from motu-sru which nobody cared for yet. Both are really low-hanging fruit, so we only need YOU to take care for providing debdiffs, doing the upload, finding testers and so on. If you want one, please make yourself the assignee to the bug in question. h

Re: Review Process

Hi folks, I've just been looking over the proposed process from Daniel, and tbh I don't think it will - in its current form - help in any way to improve the current situation with new packages. Nonetheless, there are some bits, I like with it. Please see this as constructive criticism to get th

MOTU Meeting let's do it again ;)

Hi folks, Let's stick our heads all together once again. Thus, I'm calling for a motu-meeting once again. The only thing in question is the date and time yet; I guess we'll have enough things to discuss. 1. proposal: This Friday, 12/15/06, 20.00 UTC 2. proposal: Next Wednesday, 12/20/06, 22.00

Re: MOTU Meeting let's do it again ;)

The missing link, sorry where is my head today *g* [1]: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/event -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Re: MOTU Meeting - Agenda

Hi Daniel, Am Mittwoch 13 Dezember 2006 10:57 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > > And even more importantly: Do we have an agenda somewhere? Not yet. Please everyone add points you'd like to discuss to [1]. As of writing this mail, I just added some points that came instantly to my mind. There's also

Date for next motu-meeting is...

Hi, the decision is a little bit early, because Andrew reminded me gently: [21:35:18] sistpoty: so, time to make a decision on the motu meeting [21:35:25] otherwise friday will pass us by The winning date is: This Friday, 12/15/06, 20.00 UTC Hope to see as many of you in #ubuntu-meeti

Re: azureus seems to be dead and broken in edgy eft...

Hi Steffen, Am Mittwoch 13 Dezember 2006 21:24 schrieb Steffen Mutter: > Hi there! > > I use only the sun-java stuff (even before it became GNU) and in the > past everything went fine, all other java based programs run well, but > azureus starts up and - nothing. > That's not the way it should be

Re: MOTU Meeting Minutes Friday, Dec. 15

Hi, Am Freitag 15 Dezember 2006 22:52 schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > Freeze Dates: universe will keep the same dates as > Main. cf. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeistyReleaseSchedule the decision was actually to discuss the release dates on ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list. However one proposal was to

MOTU-SRU report, W51

Hi folks, first of all, there have been more changes to the SRU-policy, but none were dramatic: * Jordan Mantha pointed out, that if a MOTU sponsors a non-MOTU with an SRU request, the MOTU still needs to make sure that the package in question builds and will work, even if the whole motu-sru t

REVU: klavaro uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:09:50 +0100 Source: klavaro Binary: klavaro Architecture: source Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Lionel Le Folgoc (mr_pouit) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Lionel Le Folgoc (mr_pouit) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: klav

REVU: dopi uploaded

Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:57:50 +0100 Source: dopi Binary: dopi Architecture: source Version: 0.3.4-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Lionel Le Folgoc (mr_pouit) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Lionel Le Folgoc (mr_pouit) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: dopi - Upload so

REVU: keytouch uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:24:22 +0100 Source: keytouch Binary: keytouch Architecture: source Version: 2.2.99+2.3.0beta3-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Giuseppe Borzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Giuseppe Borzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: keytouch - A p

REVU: innotop uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 01:33:14 +0100 Source: innotop Binary: innotop Architecture: source Version: 0.1.160-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Estienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Sebastien Estienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: innotop- top lik

REVU: klear uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:38:41 +0100 Source: klear Binary: klear Architecture: source Version: 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Marcus Czeslinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Marcus Czeslinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: klear - DVB TV viewer a

REVU: konq-plugin-digg uploaded

Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:07:57 +0200 Source: konq-plugin-digg Binary: konq-plugin-digg Architecture: source Version: 1.0-0ubuntu1 Distribution: feisty Urgency: low Maintainer: Harald Sitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Harald Sitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: konq-plugin-digg

SRU report, W1/07

Hi folks, here the sru-report for w1/07. I've tried to reorder it a little bit to match the current status of each SRU-request: Action from the SRU-team required: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/azureus/+bug/42269 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kxdocker/+bug/74862 https://launchpad.ne

  1   2   3   4   >