Dear MOTU Council,
please consider appoint Devid Antonio Filoni (d.filoni on LP) and
Nicolas Valcarcel (nvalcarcel on LP) as new motu-sru members.
Devid's application and advocates:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2008-September/004800.html
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-m
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:17:35 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
>
> One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until the last
> week before release (i.e. one more week from now).
+1
Hi,
On Thursday 16 October 2008 12:33:51 Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:17:35 -0400
>
> Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Based on:
> >
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
> >
> > One might think it's now, but I propose this not
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:41:53 +0200 Stefan Potyra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Thursday 16 October 2008 12:33:51 Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:17:35 -0400
>>
>> Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Based on:
>> >
>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
> Based on:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
>
> One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until the last week
> before release (i.e. one more week from now).
My opinion:
I think uploads which does not require a
Based on:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until the last week
before release (i.e. one more week from now).
Comments (particularly from motu-release, but others welcome)?
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mai
Hi again,
On Thursday 16 October 2008 12:41:53 Stefan Potyra wrote:
[..]
>
> Would it be even possible to set universe/multiverse back to auto until
> that time?
sistpoty|work: Launchpad provides no facility to freeze just some
components.
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description: This i
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Ullrich [2008-09-22 22:31 +0200]:
> I'm the author and maintainer of the Net::SIP perl module.
> You ship with hardy a version 0.39, which isn't the newest.
> In the mean time a lot of bugs got fixed so that it would
> be a good idea to update it.
Intrepid has newer versions o
Hi Stefan,
sorry for the *really* long delay...
Stefan Potyra [2008-06-01 4:15 +0200]:
> > Moving the source package to universe and put mencoder into multiverse
> > isn't probably possible either: I didn't check if mplayer has some
> > build-depends from multiverse (which would prevent putting
Hi MOTUs,
Pedro Villavicencio has been reorganizing and cleaning up
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs and we would like some feedback from the
MOTU community on how these pages are shaping up. The goal is to
simplify the documentation so that it is obvious on what page you need
to click on to do a gener
Hello,
Currently [0] requests for new packages are done on Launchpad and they
are not allowed on Brainstorm. However, I think that this situation is
not optimal as there's no good way to know how many people are
interested in a package * and so if someone wants to package one of
those requested ap
On Thursday 16 October 2008 13:29, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently [0] requests for new packages are done on Launchpad and they
> are not allowed on Brainstorm. However, I think that this situation is
> not optimal as there's no good way to know how many people are
> inter
(Forwarding from brainstorm-moderators@ to ubuntu-motu@)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aidan w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/10/16
Subject: Re: [Brainstorm-moderators] Using Brainstorm for packaging requests
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great idea +1
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu
2008/10/16 Kami ROUSSEAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Packaging request could be located in a different ideatorrent subdomain.
Yeah, or perhaps just a new category would be enough (after all, there
aren't that many packaging requests, or?).
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer.
On Thursday 16 October 2008 14:39, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
> Thanks for your replies so far!
>
> 2008/10/16 Saïvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
> > and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
>
2008/10/16 Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If we go this way, we should reconsider requiring needs-packaging bugs at all.
> Last I checked these bugs didn't get auto-closed because the bug wasn't
> assigned to the (non-existant until upload) package.
Hm, right, that makes sense. Usually onl
I agree with RainCT that brainstorm might be a very interesting way to
measure how many people are interested by new packages.
However, IMO, Launchpad is still the right place to consider packaging
requests because it also needs to be reviewed for many reasons :
- dependencies and libraries
-
Packaging request could be located in a different ideatorrent subdomain.
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:28:48 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Brainstorm-moderators]
Thanks for your replies so far!
2008/10/16 Saïvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
> and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
> work on the package itself.
Perhaps I haven't expressed it clearly enough, but
Hello everyone,
It's getting close to that time of the year again, where we celebrate
a new Ubuntu release and be merry. However, the drive for more
awesomeness never ceases at Ubuntu, and we'd like to kick off the
planning for the next Ubuntu OpenWeek. If you're unfamiliar with
OpenWeek (https://
>> Packaging request could be located in a different ideatorrent subdomain.
>>
>
> Yeah, or perhaps just a new category would be enough (after all, there
> aren't that many packaging requests, or?).
>
I would also opt for a packaging request category instead of a complete
sub-domain, unles
> Thanks for your replies so far!
>
> 2008/10/16 Saïvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
>> and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
>> work on the package itself.
>>
>
> Perhaps I haven't express
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:53:47PM +0200, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> Steffen Ullrich [2008-09-22 22:31 +0200]:
> > I'm the author and maintainer of the Net::SIP perl module.
> > You ship with hardy a version 0.39, which isn't the newest.
> > In the mean time a lot of
23 matches
Mail list logo
