> Was there any further discussion on this which I missed, or has
> discussion stalled?
>
I think that discussion stalled as the new brainstorm version still
insist that packaging requests should be done in launchpad :
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/submit/ refers to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubun
2009/1/22 Saïvann :
> If ubuntu policy is to accept any working software, then I think that
> using braintorm isn't worth since it don't matter how many votes this
> software get, it will be accepted anyway. The number of people
> subscribed to the bug report is already a good way to know the
> pop
> Thanks for your replies so far!
>
> 2008/10/16 Saïvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
>> and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
>> work on the package itself.
>>
>
> Perhaps I haven't express
>> Packaging request could be located in a different ideatorrent subdomain.
>>
>
> Yeah, or perhaps just a new category would be enough (after all, there
> aren't that many packaging requests, or?).
>
I would also opt for a packaging request category instead of a complete
sub-domain, unles
torm-moderators] Using Brainstorm for packaging requests
>
> I agree with RainCT that brainstorm might be a very interesting way to
> measure how many people are interested by new packages.
>
> However, IMO, Launchpad is still the right place to consider packaging
> requests bec
I agree with RainCT that brainstorm might be a very interesting way to
measure how many people are interested by new packages.
However, IMO, Launchpad is still the right place to consider packaging
requests because it also needs to be reviewed for many reasons :
- dependencies and libraries
-
2008/10/16 Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If we go this way, we should reconsider requiring needs-packaging bugs at all.
> Last I checked these bugs didn't get auto-closed because the bug wasn't
> assigned to the (non-existant until upload) package.
Hm, right, that makes sense. Usually onl
On Thursday 16 October 2008 14:39, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
> Thanks for your replies so far!
>
> 2008/10/16 Saïvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
> > and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
>
2008/10/16 Kami ROUSSEAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Packaging request could be located in a different ideatorrent subdomain.
Yeah, or perhaps just a new category would be enough (after all, there
aren't that many packaging requests, or?).
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer.
Thanks for your replies so far!
2008/10/16 Saïvann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
> and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
> work on the package itself.
Perhaps I haven't expressed it clearly enough, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
