Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:00:10 -
From: Ubuntu Installer
To: Cesare Tirabassi
Subject: [ubuntu/karmic] source-highlight-qt 0.1-0ubuntu1 (New)
NEW: source-highlight-qt_0.1.orig.tar.gz
NEW: source-highlight-qt_0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: source-highlight-qt_0.1
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:02:58 +0200
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> Maia Kozheva writes:
>
> > - It does no harm in Debian as it is, except for debcheck warnings.
> > - mplayer-nogui is available in Ubuntu, and I would rather keep the
> > same package in Debian and Ubuntu.
> > - mplayer-nogui is av
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:17:35 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
>
> One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until the last
> week before release (i.e. one more week from now).
+1
On Monday 29 September 2008 11:47:22 Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2008 11:37:37 James Westby wrote:
> >I decided to start a wiki page to track the packages that need porting
> > from Debian.
> >
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/PackagesToPort
&g
On Monday 29 September 2008 11:37:37 James Westby wrote:
>I decided to start a wiki page to track the packages that need porting from
>Debian.
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/PackagesToPort
Perhaps is worth adding a link here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/TODO
?
Cesare
--
Ubuntu-motu mail
Dear all,
Now that the transition is over, the new program is shaping up nicely, and we
have new active people helping with the reception, I would like to leave the
role of coordinating the mentoring activities to Christophe Sauthier (huats).
You should all know Christophe, he is an active and e
On Monday 08 September 2008 18:35:18 Charliej wrote:
> I am trying to setup pbuilder to use the B91dpkg-i hook to test install
> my package but I seem to be having a little problem. As you can tell
> from the snippet below the build completed successfully but when dpkg -i
> is run it complains of
A quickie for all Kubunteros out there.
I read that /usr/bin/kdesu in kde4 is obsoleted.
For Intrepid, should applications that rely on it be patched to rely
on /usr/lib/kde4/libexec/kdesu or on /usr/bin/kdesudo or is there some
mechanism in place that won't break backward compatibility?
Will exi
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 16:15:30 you wrote:
> If you tell me that a freeze exception is not necessary anyways, that's
> fine with me as well.
>From what you are telling me it doesn't seem like an additional FFe is indeed
necessary; if you get your exception now, you merge your packages fr
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 10:53:18 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Standing freeze exceptions:
> > To request a standing freeze exception, an email should be sent to the
> > Ubuntu MOTU mailing list for discussions. It is granted, once three
> > members
In line with current team policy [1],
following Luca's application [2], sent on Wed Aug 27 13:51:37 BST 2008,
considering the positive advocations [3][4][5] received,
in the absence of any concern having been raised,
considering that 168 hours have elapsed,
Luca application should be considered a
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 10:46:09 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Standing freeze exceptions:
> > To request a standing freeze exception, an email should be sent to the
> > Ubuntu MOTU mailing list for discussions. It is granted, once three
> > members
> Diffstat requirements:
> Scott raised the point, to get rid of the requirement to add a diffstat.
I think a real diff is much more useful, perhaps compressed if we are afraid
of disk real property. For BIG diffs (say >1 M) we could require them to be
available upon request.
> Bugfix only rele
Mathias,
the issue has been discussed at length within motu-release, and we unanimously
decided to revert your upload.
During our discussion we have covered all possible issues we were aware of at
the time, including those you raise in your appeal.
Our decision was made considering the technical
The recent LP changes for the worst I can still cope with, the switch to
OpenID which stops me from being able to edit any wiki page anymore I can
still abide, but the recent change of font size is too much for me:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/262166
Please tell me that this is not
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 15:59:37 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 14:51:37 Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > Stefan Potyra ha scritto:
> > > motu-release is short one member, please apply here
> >
> > If nobody nominates, I'd like to apply.
>
> Excellent! I hereby advocate you
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 11:51:08 Luca Falavigna wrote:
> motu-sru limits to Cody and me, actually.
>
> Even if SRU work is smaller now if compared to the days following Hardy
> release, there are some requests which need to be reviewed.
If there is a dare need for help, count me in.
Cesare
On Sunday 03 August 2008 22:11:13 Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> Hi!
> I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
> allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need some
> testing, so far i have test it and it's working, but i will prefer to
> have a seco
this is not appropriate.
---
MOTU Mentoring Reception Meeting
Place : #ubuntu-meeting
Participants from the mentoring reception team:
Cesare Tirabassi (norsetto)
Charlie Smotherman (porthose)
Christophe Sauthier (huats
On Friday 01 August 2008 12:50:29 you wrote:
> Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This sounds rather like a bug than a spec to me. Is there already a
> bugnumber for it? If not, can you please file a bug and tell me the number?
I have no idea if there is a bug already
On Friday 01 August 2008 09:28:49 you wrote:
The most important from me is not on the list, and that would be to have the
source package information back on the bug page (as it was before).
Its pretty annoying having to change to other pages just to see if that
package is in universe or not, wha
Dear all,
the current mentoring program has been in place for about one year.
During this time several shortcomings of this model have become evident,
especially as the number of new contributors grow. The alternative sponsoring
model is also felt quite inadequate, especially for new contributo
On Saturday 28 June 2008 00:08:20 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Subquestions are: what do you (members of motu-release) would like to add,
> what did you observer generally in regards to motu-release, what to
> improve?
One thing that irked me, and I would really do something about for Intrepid,
was th
On Saturday 28 June 2008 18:57:05 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think +2 with no objection is enough. I think that informally we mostly
> operated this way and it worked well enough.
If there is consensus than we ought to formalise it. It might have been clear
in your mind, but it was not clear at
On Thursday 26 June 2008 16:29:21 Null Ack wrote:
> My apologies for asking what seem's like a basic question but how does
> a user go about requesting that a package get updated?
Your email is a bit confused, but I guess you want to know about backports:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Ubuntu
On Sunday 22 June 2008 22:49:08 Paul Johnson wrote:
> In Hardy, we have R-2.6.2, but some R packages can't be used unless R is
> upgraded. I did not find any installable deb intended for Hardy
> systems, and decided to try to build.
There are non-official Ubuntu binary packages made for 2.7.0 by
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 13:59:04 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> since there has been no response so far, let's try the other way round:
> Cesare, Luke, Sarah, Scott: Are you up for intrepid as well?
If there is somebody else that wants to step in I'll be happy to stand aside,
otherwise I´ll be happy to
>Dear MC,
>
>please set up polls for extending motu-sru/replacing retired members [1].
>Daniel, maybe you'd also like to transfer team ownership to MC (see [2]).
>
>Candidates:
>Stephan Hermann [3]
>Scott Kitterman [4]
>Cody A.W. Somerville [5]
>
>looks, like we need two members (follow-ups to [1])
> Consider the case that a ubuntu derivative (xubuntu, mythubuntu, etc)
> decides to include the mplayer binary package on their live cd. They would
> still be required to provide and offer the source package to all software on
> (in most cases a seperate) CD. This can become pretty delicate, since
On Sunday 01 June 2008 12:12:33 Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> 1) following Debian by disabling mencoder, which doesn't seem to be wished
> by seeing posts in this thread and reactions on IRC
>
> 2) having two different source packages (which, quite frankly, doesn't
On Sunday 01 June 2008 04:15:12 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> hm... if only patent issues are a problem, I'd like to know what patents
> can actually cover. If patents only limit usage, but not distribution, I
> see no problems with putting mplayer sources in universe, and building
> binary mencoder pack
On Friday 30 May 2008 15:32:22 you wrote:
> Mplayer decodes H.264 and other MPEG-4 type content, and also contains the
> same core codebase as mencoder which encodes to said format. From what I
> understand, that means we cannot put mplayer in multiverse.
>
> If this is incorrect, then I would like
Dear all,
bug 214727
(https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/%2Bsource/mplayer/%2Bbug/214727) has
been raised on the subject.
mplayer is a direct rdepend for many packages, and indirect for I guess many
others.
Your help on this would be appreciated, please check if there are missing
packages
>It has really come to my attention that I need to have a sabbatical time
>away from Ubuntu development.
As much as I regret this decision, I understand this is for your good. I'm
looking forward to see you back with us (I'm sure it will be soon).
Good luck Dr. Mantha!
Cesare
--
Ubuntu-motu m
Dear all,
as some of you already know, we have completed recently the gfortran
transition. One of the libraries involved was r-base, which now doesn't
provide anymore libRblas.so (uses the blas one instead). Unfortunately quite
a number of packages have been built already with the older version
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 13:28:20 Daniel Holbach wrote:
> How do we justify "this needs two reviewers - we don't trust one of them
> to do it right"?
> It all boils down to the question: "Why don't we trust one MOTU to get
> it right?"
Its not a question of trust, its a question that 4 eyes s
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 11:38:19 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> >
> > I propose the following changes:
> > 1) cut down the requirement to one ACK of a ubuntu-dev member
>
> I don't think, that's a good idea.
I'm with Stefan here, from personal experience as a packager and reviewer one
ACK is almost
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 00:46:14 Jason Quinn wrote:
> The saods9 package in the science (universe) section should probably
> be removed from the repository, perhaps permanently. Here's my
> reasoning:
>
> 1) The version presently there contains a bug that does not allow it
> to interact with IRA
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 14:00:25 Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> Curses. I *knew* someone would try an april fools joke on me at some
> point today
>
> Hobbsee
Don't feel alone in this .
Cesare
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://l
On Saturday 29 March 2008 03:44:15 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently, we've got a (small) number of FFe's which look like they cannot
> be tackled by their original requestors, but nonetheless look interesting.
>
> Hence I'd like you to take a look at
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s
On Friday 07 March 2008 18:25:19 Fahad Sadah wrote:
> So I don't need to do anything to get myself officially listed or
> something?
Everybody is free to contribute, the only requirement is to be an ubuntero. If
you read the links you have been given very carefully you will see what it
means to
On Thursday 06 March 2008 18:40:07 Fahad Sadah wrote:
> I am joining the MOTU team of Ubuntu. I have read all the required
> documents, but does this make me an official member?
Hello Fahad,
nice to meet you!
I'm glad that you joined Ubuntu, your help will be much appreciated.
You should find a
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 07:51:05 Balaji G wrote:
>I am so much interested in contributing to Ubuntu and hence have joined the
>MOTU list .
Hi Balaji,
I'm glad you joined!
>I am interested in fixing small bugs to start off with and have already
>started reading through the packaging guide
On Sunday 10 February 2008 22:51:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I will be able to help that will be great, looking forward to hear any
> suggestions how to start.
Hi there Lukasz,
nice to have you here!
A good starting point is this Wiki page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment
This s
> We'll extend the nomination period for another week as we've only
> received ONE nomination up until now: only brave Luke Yelavich stepped
> up for the challenge. Come on MOTUs, don't leave him hanging, step up
> for it today!
If there is a need I'll be glad to help.
Cesare
--
Ubuntu-motu m
NEW: gpp4_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz
NEW: gpp4_1.0.4-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: gpp4_1.0.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:06:26 +0100
Source: gpp4
Binary: libgpp4-doc libgpp4-0 libgpp4-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.4-0ubuntu1
Distribution: hardy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU D
: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1
Distribution: hardy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers
Changed-By: Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gimp-normalmap - Normal map plugin for GIMP
Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 181527
Changes:
gimp-normalmap (1.2.1-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
.
* First r
On Wednesday 26 December 2007 22:53:51 Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> I working (or trying to) on Bug #178046 [1] and i have some doubts. Talking
> on #ubuntu-motu they have make me notice that the possible cause of the
> error is that some of the files is changing on build time and i need to
> backup
On Monday 26 November 2007 00:59:01 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>So far I've asked for some numbers and haven't gotten
> them.
Let me repeat once again, you haven't got any numbers simply because there are
no such numbers. We have kept no record beside those which I pointed out to
you.
What is the
On Monday 26 November 2007 00:34:03 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> .. Original Message ...
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:14:05 +0100 Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> >Thanks for sharing your opinion.
> >This thread is of interest to #ubuntu-motu-mentor
gt;
To: ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
I feel you are misunderstanding Scott.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:48:00PM +0100, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> On Sunday 25 November 2007 16:12:28 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> > That doesn't really answer my questions:
>
[...]
> We have one pr
On Sunday 25 November 2007 16:12:28 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> That doesn't really answer my questions:
>
Right now, the purpose of mentoring is not solely that of preparing MOTUs, one
of the very reasons to make the distinction clear in dividing it into two
phases.
If anything, most of mentori
On Sunday 25 November 2007 03:05:04 Brandon Holtsclaw wrote:
> > People might be more inclined to volunteer if there was more visibility
> > into the progress this project is making?
>
> I 100% agree, just dont have the numbers to make a solution to this.
>
The file where the reception records the
On Saturday 24 November 2007 11:37:48 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> It's a bit too abstract for me to provide much comment, as it's not clear
> how this would change things significantly.
I think you may have missed the link to the full proposal in my post; I'm
repeating it here:
https://lists.ubun
Dear all,
if you are using the r73 module your help will be appreciated in testing
rutilt, available in gutsy-proposed.
If you would like to test it, please add the following lines
to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Then update and instal
Dear all,
your help will be appreciated in testing libmono-addins0.2-cil and
libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil, which should be available soon in gutsy-proposed.
If you would like to test them, please add the following lines
to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-propo
Dear all,
your help will be appreciated in testing tagtool, available in gutsy-proposed.
If you would like to test it, please add the following lines
to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Then update and install tagtool with your preferred pa
Dear all,
you can find here the log of today's session:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Q%26A/Logs/16-11-07
Thanks to MOKA Daniel for hosting and everybody who partecipated!
Cesare
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.c
> I would additionally like to propose that assigned mentors not sponsor
> changes by their mentees.
Can you tell me where in the proposal it is said that mentors are required to
sponsor mentorees?
> I would be willing to sponsor hopefuls if we could make this additional
> change.
Since the cha
Dear all,
as you may know we have been discussing possible ways to make the Mentoring
program even more efficient.
One possibility raised by Emmet [1] is to split the current program in two
stages, not directly linked to each other:
Stage 1 would be directed towards newcomers and is meant as an
A testing version of rutilt has been published in gutsy-proposed.
To test it, please add the following line to your sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Then, update and upgrade (or install) rutilt.
Please provide feedback to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
On Saturday 27 October 2007 21:26:48 Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2007-10-23 18:05:31 +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> > On 2007-10-23 10:19:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > As promised when we decided to go ahead with uploads to gutsy-proposed
> > > before hardy was open, here is the list of upl
Dear all,
you can find here the log of today's session:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Q&A/Logs/19-10-07
Thanks to R&R D. for hosting and everybody who partecipated!
Cesare
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
A testing version of rpmstrap has been published in gutsy-proposed.
To test it, please add the following line to your sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Then, update and upgrade (or install) rpmstrap.
Please provide feedback to https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Dear All,
This is a reminder for the MOTU Mentoring meeting, which will take place in
#ubuntu-meeting on Freenode this Friday, October 19th at 13:00 UTC.
Agenda is confirmed as follows:
1. Current status of the Mentoring program
- Feedback from Mentors
- Drop rate
- Open requests sta
Dear all,
you can find here the log of today's session:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Q%26A/Logs/12-10-07
Thanks to Rockstar Daniel for hosting and everybody who partecipated!
Cesare
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubun
Dear all,
as announced at the last MOTU meeting, the MOTU Mentoring Reception would like
to have a dedicated meeting on the Mentoring Program.
We have set-up a provisional agenda as follows:
1. Current status of the Mentoring program
- Feedback from Mentors
- Drop rate
- Open reques
First of all,
thanks to the rocking dholbach and to everybody attending for a great
Q&A session.
I have prepared a wiki page which should be used in the future to hold
all Q&A session logs:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Q&A/Logs
You will find there an edited version of the session log for toda
Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Mathias just joined the MOTU team! He's been doing great work on the
> ServerTeam and apparmor, so we're quite pleased to have him!
>
> Please join me in welcoming him! ROCK ON, Mathias!
>
> Have a nice day,
> Daniel
>
Added Mathias and Evan to https
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 10:07 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> I thought this is what #ubuntu-motu was for?
>
I thought for a long time if it was correct to publish the following
snippet. I believe however that it is important to share with you some
considerations I received from a disappointed co
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 11:45 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Personally, I only see as a solution that of changing the
> > ubuntu-universe-contributors team participation from an open to a
> > restricted one. Only contributors that can show a minimum level of
> > competence as well as a continu
Dear all,
I have been pondering this for some time now.
I have a sympathy with Scott and Barry; I have seen myself that quite
often people misuse REVU and the people that are volunteering their
effort to get new packages in Ubuntu.
Unfortunately, I have also been using myself REVU as a contribut
was changed with the following addition (using dch -i):
firefox (2.0.0.2+1-0ubuntu2) feisty; urgency=low
* package description updated (Closes: LP#88232)
-- Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:08:04
+0100
I then rebuild the source package and checked that the executabl
Hello everybody,
my name is Cesare and I have way too much time to waste :-)
Seriously, I'd be willing to give you guys an hand for packaging,
merging, reviewing, or whatever other task I can do to help this
community grow.
Please let me know if and how I can be of help.
I hope that posting in t
74 matches
Mail list logo
