[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-29 Thread Martin Owens
Then use "Free and Open Source" which avoids the acronym, includes your golden "Open Source" branding (which is legally blind IMO) and possibly just take a sentence to explain the economics (very briefly) -- Open Source definition is inaccurate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571524 You received

[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-29 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
Oops. I forgot to address your previous comment (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/+bug/571524/comments/4). I understand your preference for FOSS; however, I'm reluctant to drop an acronym like that into a beginner's manual without proper explanation. And such explanation would inevitably

[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-29 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
I've just pushed the first of what will undoubtedly be many re-writes of the section. Please have a look and provide feedback if you can. -- Open Source definition is inaccurate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571524 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Manual Te

[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-29 Thread Martin Owens
Then don't apply either, We've been using the term FOSS for a while now to define an amalgamation between technical and social priorities which gives the whole definition a lot of strength. -- Open Source definition is inaccurate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571524 You received this bug notifi

[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-29 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
I agree that neither description is perfect, Martin, but I do think it's worth noting that the FSF explicitly refuses to endorse Ubuntu, which it claims does not adhere to the foundation's definition of "free software." Granted, their reasons for this seem to focus more on Canonical's endorsement

[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-29 Thread Martin Owens
Bryan, the definitions between the FSF and the OSI are almost the same, the problem is that the FSF definition is more tightly focused. Although I have to say that I personally don't like either. Canonical are not the Ubuntu Community, I'd be weary of a blind copy since Canonical isn't exactly doi

[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-29 Thread Bryan Behrenshausen
These comments from doctormo are valuable; however, while some address inaccuracies in the description, others simply expand the scope of the description more broadly than a beginning user may need or even wish. The initial draft of this section included information about free software and explanat

[Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 571524] Re: Open Source definition is inaccurate

2010-04-28 Thread Benjamin Humphrey
** Changed in: ubuntu-manual Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ubuntu-manual Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu-manual Milestone: None => edition-2 ** Changed in: ubuntu-manual Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Owens (doctormo) -- Open Source definition