And a question regarding above usage of fdisk:
It seems to me that numbering of:
sectors begin with 0 , but cylinders begin with 1 count ?
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Manual Team,
1MiB boundaries are optimal for they also align with 128KiB and 256KiB
which could be used in solid disk hardware.
Now how to do this using fdisk:
My thought of using of 32 heads and 64 sectors per cylinder doesn't work for
older fdisk versions (openSUSE11.2).
Let's try the other way round:
"fdi
Got it wrong...
240 * 63 * 512.0 / (1024 * 1024) = 7.3828125 MiB = 7560.0 KiB
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Manual Team, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Manual.
Status in Gnome Partit
Rachael wrote:
> Windows 7 uses a geometry of 240 heads with 63 sectors per track to
> accommodate solid state drives.
that is
240 * 63 * 512 = 7 MiB
alignment.
I heard about Win7 aligning at 1 MiB.
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this
A new idea for partitioning a new disk Megebyte aligned.
Using a different CHS config to get MiB alignments:
Now it is
1 cylinder = 255 heads * 63 sectors * 512 bytes
If you change fdisk config to
1 cylinder = 32 head * 64 sectors * 512 bytes
this should align a partition for parallel us with Wi
Scary different outputs on a mac mini
I have tried to align my many partition beyond the 4. partition.
But the following outputs scares me for they are totally different:
1. First Gpt fdisk from sf.net finds more available sectors
than ubuntu lucid fdisk which is powered by parted-2.2
2. fdisk -L
new libparted-2.2 should have solved the issue - so no extra
compatibility warning in regard to Win7 is needed any more
** Changed in: ubuntu-manual
Status: New => Invalid
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because
Thank you Colin, I aspect this is discussed further at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parted/+bug/511075
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Manual Team, which is subscribed to
... I don't know how to get attention from ubuntu developers to this
release critical issue...
** Also affects: parted (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you ar
Debian bug of this is closed:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998
because of libparted-2.1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #569998
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You
Please add attention to this horrible Ms bug which will crackdown the
linux image seen by potential new users having Win7/Vista installed.
If you are able to follow german language discussion have a look at:
http://sidux.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=19795
for more users bad experie
** Also affects: gparted
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Manual Team, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Manual.
Status in Gnome Partition Edito
** Also affects: ubuntu-manual
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Manual Team, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Manual.
Status in Ubuntu Manual:
13 matches
Mail list logo
