Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Votes LTS/all versions

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Woollard
Sorry for not replying. I wanted to see what others thought first. I also think that LTS only is the best way forward. Then having a second edition to fix issues. It least that way the project stays alive. Chris On 21 Oct 2014 11:20, "Hannie Dumoleyn" wrote: > The majority of our active memb

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Votes LTS/all versions

2014-10-21 Thread Mehmet Atif Ergun
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Hannie Dumoleyn wrote: > there were several bugs reported that need to be (or are already) fixed. If > there are many important bugs, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual, > there is a reason to publish a SE, otherwise we could decide to fix bugs so > they

Re: [Ubuntu-manual] Revisions on a section

2014-10-21 Thread Hannie Dumoleyn
I think it a good idea to explain in our manual the difference between these two words. We could add these words to our glossary and index and give an explanation with examples in section "Security concepts > Password". Op 18-10-14 om 16:52 schreef jeffrey Flaker: I would like to introduce the

[Ubuntu-manual] Votes LTS/all versions

2014-10-21 Thread Hannie Dumoleyn
The majority of our active members prefer to publish LTS only: Mehmet Ergun Thomas Corwin Jeff Flaker Hannie Dumoleyn Sylvie Gallet Patrick Dickey Mehmet Kani (preferred All versions, but changed his mind) Kevin Godby (Lets other team members decide. Concern: maybe we have to recruit an entirely