>
> Seems like DocBook has the most flexibility, but since there is some
> barrier to entry when writing DocBook maybe it'd be worth the time to come
> up with some kind of simple editing tool. That is if there isn't something
> out there better than Gedit :-).
>
My hope is that we have two class
Thanks for starting a comprehensive thread on these subjects. I probably
have more questions than answers, but maybe they'll be worthwhile.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ilya Haykinson wrote:
>
>
> Assuming agreement on the above (not a given, but I wanted to explore
> further), there are s
Hello,
On behalf of the Quickshot team, we would like to give everyone some
insight into the current plans of the Quickshot team; Quickshot is under
heavy development for Ubuntu 10.10.
One of our driving focuses is to support other projects that might wish
to capture screenshots for documentatio
All,
I would like to jump-start the discussion of the content management system
(i.e. content pool), below.
Here are my values for this type of a system:
- structured data storage with a concept of a "unit of content"
- this is the smallest "addressable" item
- I propose that the units
Public bug reported:
The manual discusses the use of apt-get update and apt-get upgrade but
doesn't mention apt-get dist-upgrade. Generally for new users dist-
upgrade is preferable to upgrade.
This bug was also filed via the google spreadsheet. Filing here to keep
track.
** Affects: ubuntu-manu
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 10:41 -0400, Adam Sommer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Matthew East
> wrote:
>
>
> For my part, I was hoping to provoke a very constructive
> discussion
> with my post about specific improvements that can be made an
Hello, Matthew.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Matthew East wrote:
> I think the critical question for us to consider is whether the
> "differences" which you set out below are really differences or not.
> In other words, are these fundamental ideological differences which
> justify having sepa
Hi Matthew,
Thank you for the thoughtful response.
> At the same time, there are some differences in our approaches as well.
>
>
>
My strong view is that all of the points which you've identified as
> "differences" between the projects are simply things which ubuntu-doc
> could be doing better
Hi Fagner,
Please in this mail list, use english, ok?
Cheers,
-
André Gondim
E-mail: andregon...@ubuntu.com
Blog: http://andregondim.eti.br
OpenPGP keys: C9721403
-
2010/5/18 Fagner fjas :
>
> Ola g
Ola gostaria de ajudar na parte de designer, tenho experiencia em HTML, CSS,
ediçao de imagens com Gimp e criaçao de desenhos vetoriais com o inkscape,
e tambem tenho um pouco de experiencia em programaçao em PHP e Mysql.
Em termos de estilo, sou ecletico e me adapto as necessidades do projeto,
pra
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Matthew East wrote:
>
>
> For my part, I was hoping to provoke a very constructive discussion
> with my post about specific improvements that can be made and ways for
> collaboration. I think that Kevin's post had the same intention. Let's
> stick to that.
>
I
Hi Martin,
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Martin Owens wrote:
> It appears for all the world like a team bogged down in it's own very
> heavy bureaucracy, historical and legacy technical implementation and an
> old school approach to contributor involvement which is not engaging.
>
> What we ha
Hey Matthew,
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 08:10 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> So I think that the answer here *is* for us all to work on
> improvements to ubuntu-doc's processes, to improve help.ubuntu.com,
> and to collaborate on material. Specifically, I think that we could
> develop a specification/blu
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Kevin Godby wrote:
> On behalf of the Ubuntu Manual team, we wanted to reach out to you to
> start reconciling our two teams' approaches to creating great Ubuntu
> documentation.
Thanks for the positive, thoughtful and constructive email, and sorry
for
14 matches
Mail list logo
