-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Whether or not sexuality is family-friendly, now that I think of it, the
inclusion of gender into that list makes even less sense.
Going by the literalist interpretation, if sexuality being in banned topics
means one can't ask if there are lesbian Ubu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been hoping for a while to replace the fox avatar at
https://launchpad.net/~sikon . I like it, and it's connected to Linux (google
linuxfox), but a friend advised me to remove it to avoid furry associations.
Does anyone here have an interest in d
Doc Kinne wrote:
You just made my day, Scott. THANK YOU!
Maia, my concern with such a "banned topic" is that it targets LGBT
people and is therefore blatantly discriminatory. Now, I say that, at
this point, not exactly having READ it so I may be talking out of my
butt (although that hasn't h
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I hadn't heard about that, I'll investigate and raise this with the
> community council.
>
> Scott
Gender and sexuality are listed among "controversial topics" that are "not for
here" in the !o4o command. To be frank, I can understand people's discomfort
about discu
The team is gradually filling, but its obscurity bugs me - I only found it when
searching for "ubuntu lgbt" in Google.
Of course, I realize that it's not the kind of team one would want to draw
attention to. :)
Still, the mailing list could be more lively than this.
_
5 matches
Mail list logo
