Two articles regarding some initiatives by the indian govt to promote
what?? (can't call this tech) are posted in their entirety below.
1. Govt gives free phones to poor instead of grains
and Sachin Pilot says that " "It is a good start made by the BSNL to
make people below the poverty line feel
Though OT, good observations. :-)
--
Regards,
Nitesh Mistry
www.mistrynitesh.com
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GB/J/IT/O>TW d+(-) s+:+>: a- C+ UL>+++ P L++>+++ !E W++ N* o? K? w--- O? M-- V?
PS+() PE(++)(-) Y+ PGP+ t 5? X R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++> h-- !r y?
--END GEEK CODE
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Nitesh Mistry
wrote:
> Though OT, good observations. :-)
oops
thanks it was meant for a different list
Dang and very sorry
ram
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Hi
Can anyone advice on what is the correct Ubuntu version that should /
can be installed on an Atom Processor Desktop
Thanks
ram
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
On 10/09/10 1:36 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can anyone advice on what is the correct Ubuntu version that should /
> can be installed on an Atom Processor Desktop
>
The standard version. Atom is x86.
--
dum vivimus, vivamus
pratul == lut4rp
http://pratul.in
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubun
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Pratul Kalia wrote:
> On 10/09/10 1:36 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Can anyone advice on what is the correct Ubuntu version that should /
>> can be installed on an Atom Processor Desktop
>>
>
> The standard version. Atom is x86.
>
>
thanks
got it installed
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Pratul Kalia wrote:
>> On 10/09/10 1:36 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Can anyone advice on what is the correct Ubuntu version that should /
>>> can be installed on an Atom Processor Desktop
>>>
>>
>>
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Nitesh Mistry
> wrote:
> > Though OT, good observations. :-)
> oops
> thanks it was meant for a different list
>
> Dang and very sorry
>
Interesting read, nonetheless.
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@l
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Ritesh Sinha
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Pratul Kalia wrote:
>>> On 10/09/10 1:36 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
Hi
Can anyone advice on what is the correct Ubuntu version that should /
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Sanjay Bhangar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Narendra Diwate
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The other 2 are vacant. Ubuntu will stay for
>> a while till I get the nerve to move to a Rolling release. Any advice what
>> should i be trying considering the past few post
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Sanjay Bhangar
> wrote:
> Gentoo and Archlinux are probably the two most popular rolling
> distros. While gentoo is 'compile almost everything from source'
> (hence based on source packages) archlinux is base
Hello,
Kindly explain the difference between Rolling and non-rolling distros and
in what way has advantages, which is best , since I am newbie to linux
cheers,
-sriranga(77yrsold)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Narendra Diwate
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>
>>
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:50:46PM +0530, Sriranga(77yrsold) wrote:
> Hello,
> Kindly explain the difference between Rolling and non-rolling distros and
> in what way has advantages, which is best , since I am newbie to linux
I am very bad at explaining things, hence try this:
http://en.wikipedi
Hello to the admins of Ubuntu LoCo team.
For your information,
Canonical is going to provide banners and other stuff to all the
approved loco teams.
Please refer to the link below for further info
http://www.reponses.net/blog/2010/09/10/579-free-banners-for-approved-loco-teams
Not sure, how to c
Is there any other way to contact the LoCo team admins?
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem
-
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
To: mail...@mistrynitesh.net
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:26:40 +
Delivery to the following recipi
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Nitesh Mistry wrote:
> Is there any other way to contact the LoCo team admins?
>
Gmail put the mail that you sent to LoCo in Spam. May consider that. Dont
know why? Never happened before.
--
Regards
Narendra Diwate
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubu
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Narendra Diwate
wrote:
>
>
> LMDE which came out recently is the one that I will certainly try when they
> come out with 64bit. I think i will be most comfortable with that.
see
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=141305
and if you want some humour w
Nitish,
Thanks for the valuable information. Which one is best in your experience.So
Rolling distros is better
Regards,
-sriranga(77yrsold)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Nitesh Mistry wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:50:46PM +0530, Sriranga(77yrsold) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Kindly explain the
Hi
was fiddling around with my Mom's netbook - which ran dual boot
windows 7 and Ubuntu 9.10.
It hadn't been updated for ages and well i updated / upgraded it -
First good news - Nothing broke and its still functional
Then the bad - lots of stuff got changed around and now it was running
the va
Hi Nitesh
as Narendra pointed out, this mail was in spam. Am not sure why
must be key words like "Ban"ners or something else
ram
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Nitesh Mistry wrote:
> Hello to the admins of Ubuntu LoCo team.
>
> For your information,
> Canonical is going to provide banners an
Hi,
I like to know whether Netbook-launcher will work on Desktop computer and
not netbook ?
Regards,
-sriranga(77yrsold)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
> Hi
>
> was fiddling around with my Mom's netbook - which ran dual boot
> windows 7 and Ubuntu 9.10.
>
> It hadn't been
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Sriranga(77yrsold)
wrote:
> Hi,
> I like to know whether Netbook-launcher will work on Desktop computer and
> not netbook ?
Yes it does
Its not netbook specific , it was created (i guess) to make it easier
to work on small machines.
I installed in on an Atom
netbook-remix is what i've been looking for since 6 months.
the idea itself is not new.
in 1984, apple mac debuted 'easy access' which changed the desktop
metaphor into something quite similar to this, without the alpha
transparency,
for kids and grannies to use with ease.
always wanted something
also, once launched, how do i get rid of it without resorting to kill processes?
niyam
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Nitesh Mistry wrote:
> Is there any other way to contact the LoCo team admins?
I am not sure why, but that email address does receive quite some emails often.
Anyway, noted.
regards,
Aanjhan
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
> That was missing and my mom was very very upset and was very clear
> that henceforth i should stay away from her machine.
>
A non Techie (I am assuming) mom asking her Techie son (again assuming) to
stay away from her computer. How attached
Is there no preferences for this app? It hogs a large amount of my
screen space, even with transparency when not in focus. I want to reduce
the width and height of the screen this app occupies.
I searched the man page but this one doesn't come with any CLI options.
Regards
Easwar
--
ubuntu-in
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> Is there no preferences for this app? It hogs a large amount of my
> screen space, even with transparency when not in focus. I want to reduce
> the width and height of the screen this app occupies.
>
> I searched the man page but this one
Ram,
Thanks for the information.
With best wishes,
-sriranga(77yrsold)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Sriranga(77yrsold)
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I like to know whether Netbook-launcher will work on Desktop computer
> and
> > not netbook ?
Thank you all friends!!
Thanks for the suggestions.
After uninstalling "gnash" ,everything seems to work all right now.
-Kaushik Guha
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Narendra Diwate
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Narendra Di
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Linux Lingam wrote:
> also, once launched, how do i get rid of it without resorting to kill
> processes?
>
My Question too. I am killing it from the System Monitor now.
Regards
Narendra Diwate
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Narendra Diwate
wrote:
>
> My Question too. I am killing it from the System Monitor now.
Sxxxla can't kill it, its persistent.
By am liking it a lot.
However as pointed out it needs works on being able to maipulate preferences
ram
--
ubuntu-in mailing list
ub
Hi
AntiX installed and typing this from it. Good OS. Very similar to Ubuntu,
but without a DE. Has IceWM and Fluxbox, so is quite light. About 1.7GB
installed. Dis not need to install anything to use Flash, mp3 etc. All out
of the box. Had tested it earlier (more than a month) in live mode.
Will
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Narendra Diwate wrote:
> Hi
>
> AntiX installed and typing this from it. Good OS. Very similar to Ubuntu,
> but without a DE. Has IceWM and Fluxbox, so is quite light. About 1.7GB
> installed. Dis not need to install anything to use Flash, mp3 etc. All out
> of t
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Narendra Diwate
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Narendra Diwate
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> AntiX installed and typing this from it. Good OS. Very similar to Ubuntu,
>> but without a DE. Has IceWM and Fluxbox, so is quite light. About 1.7GB
>> installed. D
I have not used windows vista or 7 at all, so don't know. Which file
systems do vista & 7 support natively other than ntfs and fat without
adding any 3rd party programs. Do we also need to install video and
audio drivers separately.
Also which programs are included in the default install not count
36 matches
Mail list logo