Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-14 Thread Narendra Diwate
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Sriranga(77yrsold) wrote: > When there is no minimum application and most of users accustomed with the > GUI > than commandline. I think it is not worthwhile to experiment. anyway > thanks for the information. > This is a micro distro that boots into a graphica

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-14 Thread Ramnarayan.K
More Linux's for older / smaller Systems On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Narendra Diwate wrote: >> > > Just saw that Tinycore 3.1 is released. > ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/tinycorelinux/3.x/release/tinycore_3.1.iso > Regards > Peppermint Ice resuscitates an elderly Thinkp

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-13 Thread Sriranga(77yrsold)
When there is no minimum application and most of users accustomed with the GUI than commandline. I think it is not worthwhile to experiment. anyway thanks for the information. cheers, -sriranga(77yrsold) On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Narendra Diwate wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:36

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-13 Thread Narendra Diwate
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Narendra Diwate wrote: > Pl note that this is a linux distro with no applications on it except those > that come with Busybox. And those too are command line. You need to > configure networking and then download applications before you can use them. > Dependencies

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-13 Thread Narendra Diwate
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Sriranga(77yrsold) < withblessi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > since gmail permit to upload attachment upto 25Mb, will you please upload > tinycore linux 3.0 (which is 11Mb) to me for handson experience. > with regards, > -sriranga(77yrsold) > Pl note that this

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-12 Thread Sriranga(77yrsold)
Understand your logic. cheers, -sriranga(77yrsold) On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Sriranga(77yrsold) > wrote: > > Hello, > > since gmail permit to upload attachment upto 25Mb, will you please upload > > tinycore linux 3.0 (which is 11Mb)

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-12 Thread Ramnarayan.K
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Sriranga(77yrsold) wrote: > Hello, > since gmail permit to upload attachment upto 25Mb, will you please upload > tinycore linux 3.0 (which is 11Mb) to me for  handson experience. > with regards, large mails are not such a good idea find tiny core here http://dis

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-12 Thread Sriranga(77yrsold)
Hello, since gmail permit to upload attachment upto 25Mb, will you please upload tinycore linux 3.0 (which is 11Mb) to me for handson experience. with regards, -sriranga(77yrsold) On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Narendra Diwate wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Ramnarayan.K wrote

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-12 Thread Narendra Diwate
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Ramnarayan.K wrote: > TinyCore Linux 3.0: Graphical Linux distribution under 11 Megabyte Have it and tried it. Works like a charm. However am yet to figure out persistence. Is great to see an OS in 10.7MB that gives full screen resolution supported by my monitor

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-12 Thread Ramnarayan.K
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Narendra Diwate wrote: > > > I have always believed in the KISS, minimalism, Worse is Better principles as > can be gleaned from the posts in the past. Software Bloat not welcome atleast > in my case. you will be interested in : TinyCore Linux 3.0: Graphical Li

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-11 Thread Narendra Diwate
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote: > Your talking about windows, right > > Some friends recently got them selves the B series laptops - another > friend helped to make sure the onboard windows was fully loaded. He > said that it took him the better part of a day doing that and

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-11 Thread Easwar Hariharan
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Ramnarayan.K > wrote: > O > Your talking about windows, right > > Some friends recently got them selves the B series laptops - > another > friend helped to make sure the onboard windows was fully > loa

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-11 Thread tabankg
Well said, Ramnarayan. Most of us completely endorse and support your views . Hat's off to you. +1 On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Narendra Diwate > wrote: > > I have not used windows vista or 7 at all, so don't know. Which file > > sys

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-11 Thread Ramnarayan.K
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Narendra Diwate wrote: > I have not used windows vista or 7 at all, so don't know. Which file > systems do vista & 7 support natively  other than ntfs and fat without > adding any 3rd party programs. Do we also need to install video and > audio drivers separately.

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-11 Thread Narendra Diwate
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Jkhatri wrote: > also !! > Got it. No more Also's. -- Regards Narendra Diwate -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in

Re: [ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-11 Thread Jkhatri
On Saturday 11 September 2010 12:23 PM, Narendra Diwate wrote: I have not used windows vista or 7 at all, so don't know. Which file systems do vista& 7 support natively other than ntfs and fat without adding any 3rd party programs. Do we also need to install video and audio drivers separately.

[ubuntu-in] File systems on windows

2010-09-10 Thread Narendra Diwate
I have not used windows vista or 7 at all, so don't know. Which file systems do vista & 7 support natively other than ntfs and fat without adding any 3rd party programs. Do we also need to install video and audio drivers separately. Also which programs are included in the default install not count