Has anyone ever considered re-skinning the website for the project? I
feel like it lags behind some of the other Ubuntu DE's sites. It feels a
bit word pressy. The Ubuntu MATE site is pretty good.
I'm not a web developer but I'd definitely chuck in a few £ towards a
redesign.
A good example is t
te:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On 13/03/2015 21:24, li...@boywithwings.co.uk wrote:
>> Has anyone ever considered re-skinning the website for the project? I
>> feel like it lags behind some of the other Ubuntu DE's sites. It feels a
>> bit word pressy. The Ubuntu MATE site is p
When I asked about it a while back, someone showed me some great screen
shots of a new design. Who is leading on this?
On 25/04/15 12:24, Ali/amjjawad wrote:
> Speaking of the website, what happened to the project of creating new
> and better one?! not to be rude here or harsh but it looks like i
I do like it, very clean. But does it maybe stray too far from the
original GNOME logo? I can't really see the connection.
I like what Ubuntu MATE did with their logo.
https://ubuntu-mate.org/
Just my two cents, feel free to ignore me and keep doing your thing :)
It is a really good design.
Leo
I'm guessing that its a cross between the "u" of Ubuntu and the phonetic
"n" of GNOME which is nice.
Leo
On 29/04/15 09:43, Tim wrote:
>
> On 29/04/15 18:35, Alfredo Hernández wrote:
>> Yeah, that's a serious problem. We can't use a logo that can only be used in
>> a very specific way, and eve
I hear you. Looking forward to it.
Incidentally, does anyone know the history behind the original logo? I
can't seem to find any info about it online.
Leo
On 29/04/15 10:58, Patrik Bubák wrote:
> The current design will be more polished for better understanding of
> the relations and natural de
Just updated to 15.04 and the 3.16 PPA. Everything’s great (so far), but
I'm baffled by the concept behind the weird legacy notifications tray in
the bottom left.
This is a really weird design choice and made my previous configuration
of Dash to Dock unusable. Surely It would be so much easier jus
Heya all,
I've been getting quite a lot of crashes on my system whereas GNOME
shell freezes. Dropping back to tty, the GNOME shell process is maxing a
100% CPU. Doing the command "gnome-shell -r" doesn't restart the shell
and throws up an error (which I'll write down next time). This forces me
to
: 0.25cm; line-height:
120% }
If anyone has any info?
Thanks
Leo
On 28/05/15 01:42, li...@boywithwings.co.uk wrote:
> Heya all,
>
> I've been getting quite a lot of crashes on my system whereas GNOME
> shell freezes. Dropping back to tty, the GNOME shell process is maxing a
>
against nouveau for this.
>
> I think this is the upstream bug, and its apparently fixed in libdrm 2.4.61:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89842
>
> On 30/05/15 11:40, li...@boywithwings.co.uk wrote:
>> Adding to this, these lines from logs which are repea
u
> archives by cherry-picking the fix I linked earlier. Its not really
> anything to do with the gnome3 ppa, just that 3.16 happens to trigger the
> crash.
>
> You can also try and test libdrm 2.4.61 from xorg-edgers, just to confirm
> that its actually fixed.
> Tim
>
>
t/ppa?
>
> On 04/06/15 20:33, li...@boywithwings.co.uk wrote:
>> Thanks for the prompt reply. I purged the 3.16 PPA and it hasn't
>> happened again yet. I'll file that bug for others who it might affect.
>>
>> Cheers for your advice.
>> Leo
>>
I would say drop it also. If people have a 32-bit machine, MATE, XFCE
and LXDE would be much more appropriate choices. I would say GNOME needs
4GB RAM to be really effective.
They could also use Debian, who will I'm sure will support 32-bit for a
long while yet.
My two cents
Leo
Jeremy Bicha:
13 matches
Mail list logo
