ng to use Ubuntu to develop games, but it's a bit of a barrier
if we can't export our models for use in the game without needing to
manually install it from the website on everybody's machine.
Thanks,
Sam Bull
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 11:59 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This is not "bad packaging" but a library which is not yet packaged. The best
> thing is to provide a source package packaging this library. So please
> package the collada library.
OK, that's a bit clearer. I don't have the time at the m
On lun, 2014-06-02 at 12:50 -0700, Dale Amon wrote:
> The don't like much issues:
> * Procedure of mouse to top left corner, sweep to far right edge
> to select desktop is slow. And the images only show one
> screen. Would prefer getting a lower tool bar desktop selector
>
On ven, 2014-12-12 at 23:53 +0100, Marcus Pollice wrote:
> I'd be grateful if someone could point out the reason for the difference
> and also how to compile binaries to achieve the same performance.
I know nothing about openssl in particular, but you may see improvements
simply due to the flags
On mar, 2014-12-16 at 15:31 +, Sam Bull wrote:
> On ven, 2014-12-12 at 23:53 +0100, Marcus Pollice wrote:
> > I'd be grateful if someone could point out the reason for the difference
> > and also how to compile binaries to achieve the same performance.
Nevermind,
On mer, 2014-12-17 at 00:17 -0500, Robert Schroll wrote:
> Firstly, I don't see anything here that requires an app. All of this
> could be done on a website. Once you have a website, you can make a
> webapp for Ubuntu very easily.
I would agree with that.
What I would like to see is reporting
On ĵaŭ, 2015-04-30 at 00:04 -0400, John Moser wrote:
> Caveat: the alt-tab behavior is functionally useless; I believe it may
> be an abandoned feature, because it never gets fixed and behaves in
> entirely unjustifiable ways.
The designers have thought about it. I don't necessarily agree with
th
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 15:44 +, Patrick Bowen wrote:
> It becomes annoying if you are repeatedly having to do this...
> Would it be possible and feasible to suppress this behaviour?
System Settings -> Details
One of the sections there allows you to set what to do when a device is
inserted, I ju
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Johan Kriel wrote:
> Please guys, seriously consider the implementation of shortcuts as used
> by Windows in Ubuntu. Those shortcuts are of real good use and they
> don't create unnecessary extra symbolic paths to any folder. They are a
> simple direct jump to
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Johan Kriel wrote:
> Please guys, seriously consider the implementation of shortcuts as used
> by Windows in Ubuntu. Those shortcuts are of real good use and they
> don't create unnecessary extra symbolic paths to any folder. They are a
> simple direct jump to
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Johan Kriel wrote:
> Please guys, seriously consider the implementation of shortcuts as used
> by Windows in Ubuntu. Those shortcuts are of real good use and they
> don't create unnecessary extra symbolic paths to any folder. They are a
> simple direct jump to
As somebody previously mentioned the first time you posted this, I'm
not sure why this is relevant to Ubuntu development?
Perhaps you should get in touch with the Software Freedom Conservancy,
and see if there is anything they can do. https://sfconservancy.org/
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 03:12 +,
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 12:31 +0200, Xen wrote:
> > So I think the unfairness is very much there now. Spengler is now
> > actually getting something for nothing, where before he was not,
> > and
> > the whole intention of many of the contributors to linux has been
> > subverted.
> Untrue. There was n
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 14:35 +0200, Xen wrote:
> The intention of the GPL is not really relevant.
>
> What happens is that the authors remain to have a say about how the
> product is used, if copyright is at play (at least the idea of
> copyright).
Yes, and the authors stated they require you to
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 13:54 +0200, Xen wrote:
> Because they never asked for payment or set any conditions for access
> to
> their work.
Yes they did, the GPL is the set of conditions they made for access to
their work.
> If a book is in my hands, a vendor no longer has the ability to
> direct
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 20:39 +0200, Xen wrote:
> > This exactly has happened many times. If you take a proprietary
> > piece
> > of software, make changes and resell it (breaking the license
> > agreement
> > you received it under), then the original authors are perfectly in
> > their rights to take
On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 12:58 +0200, Xen wrote:
> Because of that it will be judged according to cases such as:
> - game genie vs nintendo
> - artic vs midway
> - formgen vs micro star
So, firstly, the GPL is a copyright licence, so the conversation has
always been about copyright law. The only thin
17 matches
Mail list logo
