Re: How to use the new Launchpad status?

On 07/07/2010 01:08 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:17:19 Bruno Girin wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote: On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin > wrote: > On Wed, 2010-

Fwd: Re: How to use the new Launchpad status?

Forwarding Brian Murray's response from the ubuntu-bugsquad list. Original Message Subject: Re: How to use the new Launchpad status? Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:12:22 -0700 From: Brian Murray Organization: Ubuntu To: ubuntu-bugsq...@lists.ubuntu.com On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 10:48:2

Re: sunbird

On 07/08/2010 01:07 AM, Robert Holtzman wrote: > What is the reason for stopping development on sunbird? > Sunbird was dropped in Lucid as development was stopped upstream and we [1] did not want to support it without upstream for the 3 year Desktop cycle of Lucid. There will be a lightning plug

Re: Integrate "Apt-linker" into all Ubuntu Browsers

On 07/15/2010 07:37 PM, Ryan Oram wrote: > Matthew Paul Thomas wrote on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:59:28 +0100: >> A Greasemonkey script would work only for people already using Ubuntu >> (and using a browser that allows Greasemonkey scripts). It wouldn't do >> anything to make an apt: URL understandable

Re: Integrate "Apt-linker" into all Ubuntu Browsers

On 07/15/2010 07:49 PM, Ryan Oram wrote: > Micah Gersten wrote on Fri Jul 16 01:41:52 BST 2010: >> I don't think we should install something like this by default. If the >> license is open source, why not package it? If people want it, they can >> install it. > &g

Re: Apache2 in default Ubuntu install

On 08/13/2010 02:06 AM, Harry Strongburg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: >> php5 installs everything related to PHP, which includes the web server >> module. If you only want the command line interpreter, but none of the >> web stuff, just install php5-cli instead. But

Re: Apache2 in default Ubuntu install

Ccing the list back On 08/13/2010 02:31 AM, Harry Strongburg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Micah Gersten <mailto:mic...@ubuntu.com>> wrote: > > On 08/13/2010 02:06 AM, Harry Strongburg wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Martin > Pittma

Re: Reintroducing packages throught -proposed

On 08/15/2010 10:48 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Benjamin Drung [2010-08-14 20:51 +0200]: >>> I am asking this question, because libstdc++5 was removed from karmic >>> and it was recently reintroduces in maverick. >> >> I

Re: Firestarter

Yes, but it was updated for Maverick. Perhaps and SRU for Lucid is necessary? On 08/26/2010 07:01 AM, Kurt Kraut wrote: > As far as I tested, it doesn't work at all on Lucid. > > > Kurt Kraut > > 2010/8/26 Cosme Domínguez Díaz > > > But it works or no? > >

Re: firestarter

On 08/26/2010 10:18 PM, Jim Kielman wrote: > Opps, I sent this earlier from the wrong email address. > > The only update, was to make it so that it will build with new gtk > libraries, and other changes that allow it to work with maverick. > Firestarter has served well over it's lifetime, but w

Re: Firefox profiles on a tmpfs (ramdisk)?

ting much easier. Now, I need to modify run-mozilla.sh whenever > Firefox is updated, which is a bit of a chore.. > > I'd be very happy to provide further information for those interested. > > Cheers, > Jouko Orava > If upstream rejected for complexity, we won't be abl

Re: Mainstream Developers Repository

Actually FileZilla and Deluge are great candidates for backports and just need a bug filed against the appropriate backports project. There was some discussion at UDS about increasing the usage of backports for these types of applications so people can get the latest versions. Thanks, Micah On 1

Re: More LiveCD space optimizations

On 10/08/2010 04:54 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > [ compression related discussion removed ] > > So maybe we can save some MB with better compression, but we can save more by > not including files at all. Of course this requires inspection of the > packages > included on the liveCD. In the past

Re: Mainstream Developers Repository

Fixed top post On 04/12/2011 11:37 PM, Usama Akkad wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> On Saturday, October 30, 2010 02:35:21 pm Usama Akkad wrote: Wa alaikum alsalam, Bilal this is different from backports. for example Filezilla and Deluge have no

Re: Firefox 5, reach 11.04?

On 06/23/2011 12:00 AM, Chris Jones wrote: > First off, my apologies if someone has asked this already, but I've > only been skimming over the mailing list lately. > > Simple question, will Firefox 5 reach Natty 11.04? > Or will any releases part of the new rapid release cycle from Mozilla > be hel

Firefox 5+ and 10.04/10.10 (was: Re: Firefox 5, reach 11.04?)

id release cycle when 3.6.x reaches EOL. There is some discussion upstream about a distro supported Firefox LTS and we will keep an eye on those developments. Be assured that we intend to provide a secure browsing experience for the LTS and all the stable releases. Thank you, Micah Gersten Ubuntu Securi

Re: fcron

On 08/22/2011 01:17 AM, Steven Sroka wrote: >> On 22 August 2011 00:21, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> On 22 August 2011 00:06, Steven Sroka wrote: >>> Can I request that fcron is updated in the universe repo? The version >>> there is over 3 years old. The version listed on the fcron homepage >>> [0] is

Re: Brainstorming for UDS-P

On 09/23/2011 03:56 PM, Allison Randal wrote: > Hi all, > > While we're all in the final preparations for Oneiric, it's round about > that time in the cycle to start thinking about plans for the next cycle. > What's on your mind? > > Allison > ubuntu-restricted-extras Most of the stuff in ubuntu-r

Re: Brainstorming for UDS-P

On 10/10/2011 03:31 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >> ubuntu-restricted-extras >> >> Most of the stuff in ubuntu-restricted-extras is either not restricted >> or in partner now. Perhaps this should be broken ou

Re: wine on precise

On 12/19/2011 01:49 PM, Kai Mast wrote: > Hey guys, > > do the wine-packages on precise (64bit) still work for anyone? seems > like the dependencies broke completetly with the move to multiarch... Please see: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-October/034279.html Thanks, Micah

Re: 12.04 OpenSSL Package Question

On 02/13/2012 08:19 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Chris Woollard's message of Mon Feb 13 04:31:11 -0800 2012: >> I am sure that this can be answered very quickly. >> >> I was browsing the list of packages in 12.04 at >> http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/allpackages?format=txt.gz >> >> I n

Re: "Fix released" before "Fix committed"?

On 03/20/2012 08:31 AM, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > I don't get this: > > andreas@nsn7:~/bzr/landscape-client$ bzr branch > ubuntu:landscape-client landscape-client-12.04-0ubuntu1 > Most recent Ubuntu version: 12.04-0ubuntu1 > > > Packaging branch version: 11.07.1.1-0ubuntu2 > Packaging branch status

Re: gfortran-4.6 dependency problems

On 11/02/2012 04:45 PM, JC Lawrence wrote: > The current version of gfortran in 12.0 LTS depends on gfortran-4.6, which in > turn depends on GCC-4.6 (=, not >=), which can't be satisfied as the only GCC > release in 12.0 is 4.6.1-2. Is this likely to be resolved soon? I need > gfortran and am

Re: Puppet version bump

On 02/05/2013 06:45 PM, Ryan Tandy wrote: > John Moser gmail.com> writes: >> 2. Convince Ubuntu to put the newest Puppetmaster in Backports. I am >> not advocating this either. > Slightly off-topic, but FWIW I would be happy to see raring's puppet > (whatever version that ends up being) in prec