(sorry, accidentally sent to Matt, instead of to list.)
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:46:25PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> I'll have time to give him a hand). My concern was actually more dealing
>> with the broken deps and invariable upgrade/install
Gueven Bay wrote:
>
> Hello again ,
>
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:13:13AM +0200, Gueven Bay wrote:
So what is it that you are proposing specifically?
>>> What I want is to combine the worlds of several free operating systems with
>>> the "philosophy" of Ubuntu:
>>> ease of use, shiny ne
Ming Hua wrote:
> Also, adding a new list have the problem of making interested people
> subscribe, set up filter, etc., while discussing on ubuntu-devel
> requires no extra efforts.
Hrm, good point. It'd be kind of nice if Launchpad automatically set up
mail aliases or somesuch for its groups (on
Fergal Daly wrote:
> On 10/05/07, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:03:30PM -0400, Jim Doherty wrote:
>>> Sorry, I have no idea what ubuntu policy is. But good defensive
>>> scripting practice includes setting your $PATH to something safe. A
>>> good script sho
Ming Hua wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:59:19AM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
>> Fergal Daly wrote:
>>
>>> You are also implying that everything in /usr/bin that start with
>>>
>>> #! /usr/bin/{perl,python,...}
>>>
>>> is wrong and sho
Ming Hua wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:33:41PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
>> Ming Hua wrote:
>>> For the sake of discussion, I think
>>>
>>> #!/usr/bin/env perl
>>>
>>> will pick up $PATH and is a valid #! line. I also believe this
From https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/70569 submitted
by Constantine Evans:
-
When invoked as vi, vim.tiny sources /etc/vim/vimrc.tiny, which sets
compatible so that the vi command runs like the original vi. According
to several people on -devel, this is the desired behaviour fo
A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154
describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way
that tar's default is to overwrite existing files, causing him to lose
important data.
While I'm opposed to fixing the problem in ta
Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op donderdag 17-05-2007 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Micah
> Cowan:
>> A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154
>>
>> describes his frustration as a new user, in discoverin
Onno Benschop wrote:
> On 18/05/07 06:18, Micah Cowan wrote:
>> A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at:
>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154
>
>> describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way
>> that tar's
Onno Benschop wrote:
> From a usability perspective I would feel that you're changing expected
> behaviour for existing users. I also note that there are no active
> aliases in my current (Edgy) installation, and that the ones there are
> commented out.
Absolutely. The choice, as I see it, is mino
Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:03:18PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote:
>>> A completely different approach could be that the calls that
>>> actually write to a file check that the file does not exist. You
>>> could activate this with a system-wide flag, b
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday 17 May 2007 18:18, Micah Cowan wrote:
>> A user, timothy, describing his difficulties at:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113154
>>
>> describes his frustration as a new user, in discovering the hard way
>
The question I'd like to ask, is: why is vim-gtk in universe, whereas
the other vims (which come from the very same source package) are in main?
Part of the motivation for this question is bug 110152 in Malone:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/110152
In that bug, users report up
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> It turns out now, after having had more talks with the Launchpad team
> that *restrictions will not be placed on In Progress, Fix Committed or
> Fix Released* at this point. More work is needed to make that possible,
> so it will not be included in this round. Doing t
15 matches
Mail list logo
