Jonathan Riddell wrote:
The universe archive for hardy will be frozen solid at 0800UTC
tomorrow (Wednesday 23rd). Uploads which fix important bugs and are
approved by motu-release will be accepted before then.
Preparation of ISO images for 8.04 is in progress (join us for testing
in #ubuntu-tes
Doh. That was intended for JR. Oh well, congrats to everyone else who's
been working on the KDE4 remix :-)
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Ubuntu Announcements wrote:
The Ubuntu team is pleased to announce Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (Long-Term Support)
on desktop and server, continuing Ubuntu's tradition of integrating the
latest and greatest open source technologies into a high-quality,
easy-to-use Linux distribution.
Congratulations all o
Mark Fink wrote:
I just read this article:
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/07/ubuntu-remix-codecs/
I hope this is wrong or I will have to stop using ubuntu and find
another distro to use. Such a shame...
Mark, Remco
There is (again) absolutely no truth to the rumour that Canonical has
don
The server is more difficult to define as a single "thing" than the
desktop. We've taken the view that the best service we can provide to
the free software community is to ensure that Ubuntu's server offering
is highly modular, so you can start with something minimalist (the out
of the box ex
Dereck wrote:
> This week's HugDay target is *drum roll please* Firefox 3!
> * 658 New bugs need a hug
> * 131 Confirmed bugs just need a review
>
> I don't think anything needs to be said about how important Firefox
> is, it just needs to work. With over 1300 bugs currently open, we can
> use a
I think we should put a URL in the release notes, rather than an
explicit list, so that it's current whenever people read it.
Mark
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Congratulations to everyone on the release of the Ibex!
There are a number of highlights that everyone is talking about but for
me the real highlight is the way our community continues to grow. It's
wonderful to see so many people from so many disciplines across so many
different communications m
I think being on an RC, as opposed to a final release, is as awkward for
us as it is for everyone else. It makes all of our updates harder,
because the codebase is unique to us, it's not a release that upstream
cares about. So, in this case, I think it's a perfect candidate for
-proposed, which is
On 21/09/10 20:20, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> For universe/multiverse packages, that are NOT found on any installation
> media, Feature Freeze Exceptions [1] can be obtained from one of the
> delegates in addition to ubuntu-release until the date of Final Freeze for
> universe [2]:
>
> * mythbuntu:
On 22/09/10 15:45, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> Very nice, organised communication, thanks Stefan!
> How are the delegations working out, now that we have a couple of
> substantial teams carrying their respective responsibilities? Any
> observations / suggestions / concerns on your
On 28/03/11 04:32, Dylan McCall wrote:
> Something I've noticed lately has me a little concerned. I am hoping
> you folks can put my fears at ease! When I look at bug reports for
> Unity, I often encounter links to what I assume are design documents
> internal to Canonical. Here is one of those bug
That's super - thanks Neil! Please pass appreciation on to the relevant
person at Valve.
On 10/02/14 15:51, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I'm sure most will be aware, for the last couple of weeks, Valve have
> offered access to all Valve produced games free of charge to Debian
> Developer
On 08/04/16 17:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Thanks to some stellar work by Dimitri Ledkov and Colin Watson, and as
> discussed on ubuntu-devel over the past couple of months[1,2], a change has
> been landed to Launchpad and the archive reports[3] to allow packages in
> main to build-depend on univer
Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
laptops, but I would not be surprised if 32-bit x86 is used in small
'embedded' environments. Ple
OK, I'm reassured that we're thinking about this appropriately, thanks
Dimitri & friends.
Mark
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Nicely done :)
Mark
On 25/08/16 18:14, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> "The Jogpa, in our mad flight, cut off a long lock of the yak's silky
> hair. Having secured this, he appeared to be quite satisfied, let go,
> and sheathed his sword."
>
> ― Arnold Henry Savage Landor
>
>
> The first beta of the
Scott James Remnant wrote:
The distinction between main and restricted is done based on licensing:
software in main fulfils the necessary freedoms for modification and
redistribution, software in restricted may not.
[snip]
I therefore propose an alternative.
We move all packages from univer
18 matches
Mail list logo
