Re: 2 panels waste the height needed for web browsing on 16/10 screens

2010-04-02 Thread John King
I noticed this on my laptop; the default Gnome layout looks horrible on it (its too little space on 1280x768, which is considered low-res nowadays). I use the one-panel Linux Mint configuration now, though. I don't think the default layout should change though, perse. Perhaps we'll find these pr

Re: Ubuntu needs a new development model

2010-05-05 Thread John King
Personally, I've been thinking about suggesting an 'updates'/'main-updates' repo, for at least commonly used applications. It would be implemented in a way in which apt wouldn't auto upgrade the program (or at least ask first), but it would be accessed by an addon maybe, to the Ubuntu Software C

Re: "Next thing for Ubuntu to learn: how to pay their engineers well enough, and how to give them enough time to work on upstream issues"

2010-05-05 Thread John King
This is true on so many levels, Canonical, are you paying attention?! Danny Piccirillo wrote: >I came across this on reddit, thought it would be worth bringing here. >http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/c090v/next_thing_for_ubuntu_to_learn_how_to_pay_their/ > >https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt

Re: Is Ubuntu commited to free software?

2010-06-09 Thread John King
I think that providing a completely free install option with the Linux-libre kernel would be more trouble than it's worth. As a couple have pointed out, it could cause more accessibility issues and would require resources for its upkeep that could be better used elsewhere. There is a completel

Re: Is Ubuntu commited to free software?

2010-06-09 Thread John King
Sorry for top-posting; it's Android. I don't think he has an issue with the governance of the kernel project per se; he's just presenting a fact. You can't really have a completely free Linux distro or install option, which is what he proposed, when the very kernel of the OS itself is non-free.

Re: Is Ubuntu commited to free software?

2010-06-09 Thread John King
rker on the list, but I feel a bit compelled to >> jump into the fray here. >> >> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 16:49 -0400, John King wrote: >> >> >>> Ubuntu is targeted at a more mainstream user; that user more than likely >>> wants his computer to >>

Re: Is Ubuntu commited to free software?

2010-06-09 Thread John King
Once again, the issue is basically that the Mp3 format is patented, nothing else really that I know of. Travis Beaty wrote: >Hmm. This confuses me, then. Because I know it was a problem at one >point, at least with SuSE. I had to get different packages from plf in >order to play them. > >- T

Re: Is Ubuntu commited to free software?

2010-06-10 Thread John King
GNewSense isn't an active project from what I could tell the last time I checked out their site. Trisquel's more up-to-date. Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >On 10 June 2010 17:32, David Schlesinger wrote: >> Having gotten that authoritative answer, I'm _still_ not sure it would have >> the slightest

Re: Appearance of active window in bottom bar

2010-06-11 Thread John King
You're not alone; I too have found this confusing at times. My workaround was to install Docky! Aaron Whitehouse wrote: >Hello all, > >I've used Ubuntu since Hoary and love it. > >One thing that I have found has caught me out a lot recently is the >appearance of active and minimised windows in