Kubuntu 9.04RC1 LiveCD excessive hard drive activity, whilst idle

2009-04-17 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Hello all, I just tried out the Kubuntu 9.04 RC1 LiveCD on my desktop. After a couple of minutes it starts accessing the hard drives as well as the CD itself, causing an unresponsive system. This is while the system is idle otherwise. At first I thought it was some kind of indexing service. Wh

Re: Kubuntu 9.04RC1 LiveCD excessive hard drive activity, whilst idle

2009-04-17 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Friday 17 April 2009 8:40:13 am Ioannis Nousias wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I just tried out the Kubuntu 9.04 RC1 LiveCD on my desktop. After a >> couple of minutes it starts accessing the hard drives as well as the CD >> it

Use SVG icons instead of PNG

2008-02-09 Thread Ioannis Nousias
I'm sure this has been asked before. Most of the system application launchers use PNG icons. For example, Firefox and Thunderbird (two of the most commonly used apps). Very few use SVG, like gnome-terminal. I like to have few icons on my desktops that are stretch to ~x2 their size. PNGs look a

Re: Use SVG icons instead of PNG

2008-02-09 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Milan wrote: > SVG icons have to be generated and present in the "scalable" subdirs of > your theme, or of the fallback theme ("hicolor"). Most apps already have > SVG icons, maybe some don't install them. > As for the performance side, several PNG icons are generated, one for > each common size so

Re: Use SVG icons instead of PNG

2008-02-10 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Milan wrote: > Every trivial bug that affects so many packages is a pain to solve. You > can still create an unique report on Launchpad, and mark it as affecting > several packages: this is faster to do and allows to see the progress of > the work. But many times, you have to report a bug upstream

Re: Use SVG icons instead of PNG

2008-02-10 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Denis Washington wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 14:42 +0000, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > >> ok, I followed your advice and filed a report for gnome-terminal (which >> also exhibits the same issue). >> >> for your records: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubunt

Re: Too many icons in the Ubuntu menus?‏ (repos t)

2008-02-11 Thread Ioannis Nousias
My personal opinion is that visual aids, such as launcher icons, are a necessity. Removing them would be a step in the wrong direction. I do I agree that icons design must be improved in order for them to serve their purpose right from the start (when the user has not yet made the association b

Graphics (restricted) modules in gutsy

2008-02-23 Thread Ioannis Nousias
I've noticed that the nvidia binary blobs are quite out of date. There are some fixes in the legacy branch (96xx) on the new release (96.43.05), that makes compiz usable on cards the driver supports. It would be nice for these new releases to land in the repos soon. (I've been using 96.43.05, m

Re: Bug and discussion about ubuntu menu

2008-03-15 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) wrote: > Thank you for this constructive comment. Technically speaking, it'll be > very hard to have every section GUIs merged into one (as those are > different applications). So there is 2 solutions I see : > - Using sub menu for section : > > System > ` co

Re: Bug and discussion about ubuntu menu

2008-03-15 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) wrote: > Ioannis Nousias wrote: > >> Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) wrote: >> >>> Thank you for this constructive comment. Technically speaking, it'll be >>> very hard to have every section GUIs mer

LLVM 2.2

2008-03-22 Thread Ioannis Nousias
is there any chance in seeing LLVM 2.2 version in Hardy (released in February)? Current version is 1.8, which I think is from Q4 2006! A request to update the LLVM version has been in launchpad for some time now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm/+bug/136495 regards, Ioannis --

Re: LLVM 2.2

2008-03-23 Thread Ioannis Nousias
Matthias Klose wrote: > Ioannis Nousias schrieb: > >> is there any chance in seeing LLVM 2.2 version in Hardy (released in >> February)? Current version is 1.8, which I think is from Q4 2006! >> > > Yes, if you do follow our documented procedures. >