Folks,
As a newbie to Ubuntu I have to say it is hard to believe that Ubuntu Desktop
and Ubuntu Server come from the same stable.
The Ubuntu server should come in two offerings; i.e. the unfriendly existing
Ubuntu server, and, more importantly to the masses, a friendly pre-configured
Ubuntu se
40 or so
users i.e. they don't need a sledge hammer to crack a nut, but they do need a
big helping hand to hide them from the bowels of the server and the command
line.
Regards,
Tony
- Original Message
From: Anthony Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.u
Hello Tacone,
People from the Windows world don't like the command line because it is all too
easy to forget to do something that should be done. Not only that but one has
to remember all the commands etc. GUI dialogs etc contain radio option buttons,
checkboxes, Wizards etc protecting the user
cure a root server for personal homepages. And with this web uis I
don't mean webapps like RHN or Landscape.
Regards,
\sh
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Anthony Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-d
Message
From: Mark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anthony Watters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 4:39:06 PM
Subject: Re: Disappointed with Ubuntu Server, could be used by such a wider
audience
The server is more diffic
Folks,
I've decided that I'll be using either the ClarkConnect
(http://clarkconnect.com) which is Red Hat RHEL/Cent OS based or SME Server
(www.smeserver.org) with PHP fired up. People on www.whirlpool.net.au report
good experiences with both of these offerings. Both come preconfigured and hav
One way or another the world is going to head in this direction for home and
small business users
(http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/windowshomeserver/default.mspx).
Of course, for large scale enterprises, which is where Ubuntu Server is
clearly aimed at, it's a different stor
