Re: [ubuntu/karmic] arora 0.8.0-0ubuntu6 (Accepted)

2009-08-08 Thread Andreas Moog
have warned about that, see the tag dh_desktop-is-deprecated and dh_desktop(1) manpage. Regards, Andreas Moog signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.u

Re: Fwd: libmpfr1ldbl not found in oneiric

2011-12-10 Thread Andreas Moog
On 12/09/2011 06:48 PM, diego fanesi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to install bigbluebutton on oneiric but libmpfr1ldbl package > seems to be missing. The whole mpfr source package has been replaced by mpfr4. The library package is currently called libmpfr4. > Could you add this package on officia

Re: nginx package

2012-02-22 Thread Andreas Moog
On 22.02.2012 17:35, Deni Bertović wrote: > Unfortunalety that does not happen. That's the main problem. > After doing 'apt-get remove nginx', 'apt-get autoremove' does NOT remove > the nginx-full and nginx-common packages. That seems to be a problem on your system then, not with the nginx package

Re: nginx package

2012-02-22 Thread Andreas Moog
On 22.02.2012 18:45, Bedwell, Jordon wrote: Please do not CC me on replies, I'm subscribed to the list. > Without seeing where he mentioned his OS I'll just assume he's on > 12.04 where this is a problem. My paste is from 12.04, it's not a problem there. > Apt does not autoremove some package

Re: nginx package

2012-02-22 Thread Andreas Moog
On 22.02.2012 21:28, Deni Bertović wrote: > I am on Ubuntu 11.10. > I then try: > > 'apt-get autoremove' > > And nothing happens. I fail to see how this is an issue with my system if > it's a fresh install of Ubuntu. http://people.ubuntu.com/~amoog/nginx-install-remove-oneiric.log is from a fres

Re: Update duplicity

2012-03-03 Thread Andreas Moog
On 03.03.2012 19:18, Dan Lange wrote: > v0.6.17 was released three months ago but Ubuntu hasn't updated their > packages for 11.10 (oneiric). Is there something blocking this or has > Duplicity slipped through the cracks? We generally do not package new upstream versions for previous releases of U

Re: Drop Gwibber from default install

2012-03-14 Thread Andreas Moog
On 14.03.2012 15:44, Rodney Dawes wrote: > Ditën e Wed, 14/03/2012 më 14.21 +0200, Timo Jyrinki ka shkruar: >> Sure it's the >> good ol' laggy Gwibber, > > Can you please clarify what you mean by "laggy" here? And are > there bugs open for what you mean by your use of the term? I don't know if T

Re: Ignoring privacy sabotages Ubuntu's best chance for success

2014-02-25 Thread Andreas Moog
On 24.02.2014 12:08, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > Ubuntu has extensive designs for privacy settings on both PC and phone. > As with > everything else in Ubuntu, there's always more to do than we have time > for. I'd like to see Ubuntu not phoni

Re: What is the best way to package going forward (deb or snap?)

2017-06-05 Thread Andreas Moog
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:40:56PM +, Joseph Smidt wrote: > And to make matters worse, half the security packages in Kali > not in Debian are free software that just doesn't meet Debian's strict > guidelines and thus can't ever go this route. Do you have an example for such a software? If its

Re: Why doesn't puf support https?

2017-10-06 Thread Andreas Moog
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 11:35:48AM +0100, Sai wrote: > puf: unknown protocol in https://some_url (from uls_file.txt) > puf: Invalid URL 'https://some_url'. > > Is there a reason puf doesn't handle https, or is this a bug? It's on the upstream author's ToDo list at http://puf.sourceforge.net/TODO