Hello,
Ubuntu currently ships openssl 3.0. Debian will release with 3.0.
Debian experimental contains 3.1. Openssl 3.1 has been out for a couple
months. It seemed natural to switch to 3.1 which contains a number of
interesting changes including fixes for performance regressions except
that...
Qu
On Tue, May 16, 2023, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> On 2023-05-15 05:18, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Ubuntu currently ships openssl 3.0. Debian will release with 3.0.
> >
> > Debian experimental contains 3.1. Openssl 3.1 has been out for a couple
> >
operly benchmarking such
changes requires a good test environment and possibly extra hardware.
I had thought about making a PPA for newer versions in order to make it
easier for people to execute their own benchmark with them. That's maybe
the only way to gather more feedback on the performa
Hi,
On Thu, May 18, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > We had similar dilemma around focal release. And I did SRU one off upgrade
> > from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1. it was a minor disaster. (As in like the sad
> > depressing songs in A mino
n any case, we'll know if the planned and the actual
release cadence and calendar match.
--
Adrien
On Wed, May 31, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > We had simil
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few weeks ago, openssl maintainers announced moving to a time-based
> release (April and October):
>
> https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2023/09/29/OpenSSL-Update-ICMC23/
>
> > Key takeaway 3 : Time Bas
NB: attempting to re-send with a slightly different e-mail address that
might make my mails pass list moderation automatically (no idea why I
receive mails to a From: which isn't the one I'm subscribed with)
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at
NB: re-sending with an e-mail adderss that isn't moderated; moderator:
feel free to reject duplicate mails in the moderation queue
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 15:35, Adrien Nader wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20
NB: re-sending with an e-mail adderss that isn't moderated; moderator:
feel free to reject duplicate mails in the moderation queue
(stripping the quotes a bit)
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > The issue is
(stripping the quotes a bit)
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > The issue is that we do not know when will be the next openssl LTS. We
> That's irrelevant. Once Ubuntu release goes stable, we no longer appl
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:34, Adrien Nader wrote:
> >
> > (stripping the quotes a bit)
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Adrien Nader wrote:
> >
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 15:35, Adrien Nader wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > A few weeks ago, openssl maintainers announced moving
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:28:02AM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > We talked about creating a new "openssl" package that is whatever the
> > most recent version is (in universe, and probably with no ESM-guarantee
> > att
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:28:02AM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote:
> > We talked about creating a new "openssl" package that is whatever the
> > most recent version is (in universe, and probably with no ESM-guarantee
>
> Wou
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024, Dauren Sarsenov wrote:
> Hi, guys.
>
> I wonder, how much time does it usually take to release an update version of
> tzdata package? Asking, because there is a new upstream build
> (https://www.iana.org/time-zones), and rather critical one to us, who live in
> Kazakh
Hi,
This is something I discussed in Madrid and some people were interested.
Basically, I'd like to build a database of tests that are not reliable.
I think there is value in knowing which tests are flaky. What will be
done or can be done with this knowledge is uncertain and will certainly
depend
Hi,
I firmly believe that reports must make issues obvious and should offer
everything useful for digging in deeper. I don't think
update_excuses.html does that: it mostly exposes micro-issues and makes
you click several times before getting the information you need. It's
britney's output re-form
Hi,
This is a documentation message rather than a report. Let's face it: I'm
at the stage where I barely understand some parts of britney's reports
but as everyone knows, this is also the stage where we feel the most
confident teaching about things.
This is written as a story rather than document
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024, Adrien Nader wrote:
> Second, it would probably be beneficial to have the list of old and new
> package names in migrations if they are different. (and then show
> package status when hovering over a package's name!)
A few mere hours after sending my previous
e bottom left are non-pqc signature algorithms. The scale is
logarithmic; some of the signatures are massive. You can also scoll down
and look at the performance metrics: almost all algorithms are much
slower than classical ones.
--
Adrien Nader
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-
20 matches
Mail list logo
