On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:51:11AM +0800, Gareth wrote:
> the same package from different (but related) repo has different
> dependencies. One is '(= 5.5.35+dfsg-1ubuntu1)' and another is '(=
> 5.5.44-0ubuntu0.14.04.1)'. The first on from trusty and breaks in
> installation if I don't set ddebs' tr
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:51:11AM +0800, Gareth wrote:
>> the same package from different (but related) repo has different
>> dependencies. One is '(= 5.5.35+dfsg-1ubuntu1)' and another is '(=
>> 5.5.44-0ubuntu0.14.04.1)'. The first on from tr
Hey guys
Are python2.7 binaries from official packages compiled with systemtap markers?
--
Gareth
Cloud Computing, OpenStack, Distributed Storage, Fitness, Basketball
OpenStack contributor, kun_huang@freenode
My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistakes in my email
from Mar 1 2013,
Hi,
there were already discussions about violations of the GPL on Linux
audio lists, but I have forgotten if it's allowed to provide the source
to customers only. IMO it doesn't matter what's allowed and what isn't
allowed, there's an ethical commitment to keep source code open. Another
issue is t
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:07:02 -0700, Ryein Goddard wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:19:36 + (UTC), rajeev bhatta wrote:
>> >It is not time consuming.. just for the user experience..
>>
>> IMHO for averaged users it is time consuming. Even a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:11:01PM +0800, Gareth wrote:
> I know this. But at the first time I enabled ddebs' trusty only (no
> trusty-updates yet), I got errors from running apt-get install this
> package. Because the mysql-server's latest version is
> 5.5.44-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, and the dbgsym packa
Thanks Colin :)
I have a better understanding for 'updates' repo now :)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:11:01PM +0800, Gareth wrote:
>> I know this. But at the first time I enabled ddebs' trusty only (no
>> trusty-updates yet), I got errors from
Hi Ubuntu Guys
I'm systemtap users on ubuntu. Here is an issue about mysql dbgsym
package. Below are some details
ps:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/462299/ some bash history
http://paste.openstack.org/show/462471/ the packages I have installed
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fra
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:52:57PM +0800, Gareth wrote:
> I'm systemtap users on ubuntu. Here is an issue about mysql dbgsym
> package. Below are some details
>
> ps:
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/462299/ some bash history
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/462471/ the packages I have instal
You could add multiple sources that store an encrypted checksum and then
reference that with an Ubuntu branded downloader. That program would be
pretty easy to make and it would abstract away all requirements for
anything time consuming from the user.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Ralf Mardorf
And how would you know the Ubuntu-branded downloader is secure?
I think you're over-complicating things here. Anyone interested in
verifying a download is correct can verify the posted SHAsum, and anyone
really concerned could install from a netboot (mini.iso), check its seed
file, and download al
That part is easy because it could be a open script with probably less then
10 lines of code.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:23 PM, J Fernyhough
wrote:
> And how would you know the Ubuntu-branded downloader is secure?
>
> I think you're over-complicating things here. Anyone interested in
> verifying
An "open" script with an encrypted checksum? What's to stop someone
compromising this script during transport? You have recreated *exactly* the
same problem, just a level higher.
On 15 September 2015 at 20:27, Ryein Goddard
wrote:
> That part is easy because it could be a open script with probab
We are talking about a more secure method with a built in way to checksum
that is easy for users not the Pentagon.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:30 PM, J Fernyhough
wrote:
> An "open" script with an encrypted checksum? What's to stop someone
> compromising this script during transport? You have rec
It's no more secure than running:
sha256sum -c ubuntu-installer.iso.shasum
or just:
sha256sum ubuntu-installer.iso
and manually checking the values match.
I'd even argue a script is less secure, as the user is running an arbitrary
script they've downloaded. It's also no more straightforward as
If we are trying to target newbies that don't know what a sha256sum is then
I highly doubt they will be running Ubuntu in order to run that command.
Personally when I make an ubuntu ISO my CD burner program checks the value
for me..so it isn't an issue for me. I am also not worried that it has
be
OK - now you've lost me.
Earlier in the thread you were talking about PGP keys and web-of-trust, not
about verifying the integrity of a downloaded file.
You also mentioned a 10-line script to use as a downloader. Whoever is
downloading the file has to use some operating system to do so, whether
*
Oh that wasn't me. Having a downloader that actually checks to make sure
it downloaded properly and has the correct sum is going to be more secure
then not checking at all. In the off chance the script/ "program" is
hacked a long with the ubuntu ISO all hope is lost, but that is two attack
vector
I'm not good at these really. Can I provide more information to help
for tracing my problem?
Btw, I could find the file
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/7c/5b991d6ba0d7722a41f9a39e2915f6a354a1c7.debug
in my system. How could I check whether it works with installed
mysqld?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:06 AM,
Hi, Colin -
> This is a mistaken analysis. /usr/sbin/mysqld is in
> mysql-server-core-5.5, not mysql-server-5.5, and therefore its debugging
> symbols are in mysql-server-core-5.5-dbgsym:
Thank you for the correction. I must have misread the output from "dpkg -S".
> $ dpkg -c mysql-server-
20 matches
Mail list logo
