On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Robert Park wrote:
> I propose that we fix Eog, but leave the file with the extension .png ;-)
Is it that hard to change a file name?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubun
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Robert Park wrote:
>> I propose that we fix Eog, but leave the file with the extension .png ;-)
>
> Is it that hard to change a file name?
Is it that hard for you to send a patch changing a file name?
--
Ubuntu
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> Is it that hard for you to send a patch changing a file name?
Not sure, as the package should contain a ton of binary wallpapers.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:44:05 +0800
> Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>
> warty-final-ubuntu.png is actually a JPEG file
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-wallpapers/+bug/296538
It was a hard bug which is why it hadn't been solved years ago. I
think the bug is fixable now (and not as hard) with
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> It was a hard bug which is why it hadn't been solved years ago. I
> think the bug is fixable now (and not as hard) with the switch to
> gsettings and by using dh-migrations.
I can understand that it may be quite hard to do a reliable migration
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> I can understand that it may be quite hard to do a reliable migration
> on released versions. However, cannot you take a chance to fix it in
> Ubuntu+1? I'm using Saucy now but I don't mind you break things
> temporally to fix this bug.
It would
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> It wouldn't matter if you minded because Saucy is in development so it
> would be rather ironic for you to mind things breaking.
That's exactly why it is strange that the bug is still open now. There
are too many cycles to fix it.
--
Ubunt
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 10:45 +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:49 AM, C de-Avillez wrote:
> > I thought in UNIX (and Linux, and similar) we did not depend on the
> > extension of a file name.
>
> Try:
> $ eog /usr/share/backgrounds/warty-final-ubuntu.png
>
> Don't make excuses f
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Rodney Dawes
wrote:
> It's not an excuse. It's a fact. More importantly, the Ubuntu release
> name is no
> longer "warty" either, so that alone should give you some insight on why
> it is
> still named the way it is. How about simply making it actually be a .png
>
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Rodney Dawes
wrote:
> Furthermore, as already stated, this is a bug in eog (or perhaps
> gdk-pixbuf), if it
> can't open an image file where the extension doesn't match the content.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/172416
https://bugzilla.gnome.o
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio <
a.star...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Rodney Dawes
> wrote:
> > Furthermore, as already stated, this is a bug in eog (or perhaps
> > gdk-pixbuf), if it
> > can't open an image file where the extension doesn't matc
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Hollocher
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Rodney Dawes
>> wrote:
>> > Furthermore, as already stated, this is a bug in eog (or perhaps
>> > gdk-pixbuf), if it
>> > can't open
12 matches
Mail list logo
