On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
[...]
> Good tip on the workaround, Mathieu. Looks like this doesn't work in
> Ubuntu 12.10 pre-release here:
>
> # echo cache-size=400 >/etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/cache
>
> $ ps -ef | grep dnsmasq
> nobody2057 1128 0 11:29 ?
On 8 October 2012 21:10, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> [...]
>> Good tip on the workaround, Mathieu. Looks like this doesn't work in
>> Ubuntu 12.10 pre-release here:
>>
>> # echo cache-size=400 >/etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d/cache
>>
On 8 October 2012 13:24, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> Can you elaborate the specific reasons/mechanisms why without per-user
>> caching, dnsmasq is still a security weakness? At least these views
>> should be shared upstream so we can work on