IMO, we'll end up sooner or later using NM on X-less boxes by default
NM on Fedora can now handle bonding and bridging by reading
"/etc/sysconfig/netwok-scripts/ifcfg-*" files.
I was curious about whether NM could do the same by reading
"/etc/network/interfaces" so I've just tried to install NM i
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:00 PM, David Klasinc wrote:
> Implementation wise, I think the best way would be if PPA system can be
> extended to offer necessary support for selling software. This way Steam,
> Desura and alike could offer a simple PPA. PlayOnLinux could probably do
> this already.
>
Excerpts from Tom H's message of 2012-08-22 00:24:11 -0700:
> IMO, we'll end up sooner or later using NM on X-less boxes by default
>
I do not share your opinion. While I'm not ifupdown's biggest fan, it
will likely be the network configuration tool of choice on servers for
the forseeable future.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Tom H wrote:
> IMO, we'll end up sooner or later using NM on X-less boxes by default
It might be the case eventually, but we're not there yet.
> NM on Fedora can now handle bonding and bridging by reading
> "/etc/sysconfig/netwok-scripts/ifcfg-*" files.
>
> I was
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:56:40PM -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Tom H wrote:
> > IMO, we'll end up sooner or later using NM on X-less boxes by default
>
> It might be the case eventually, but we're not there yet.
I usually de-install it on servers. A s
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Dale Amon wrote:
> I usually de-install it on servers. A server has the interfaces
> and static IP addresses I tell it has and it should never, ever
> even consider overriding those settings.
>
> NM is okay (usually) for portable luser devices, but not for
> the ra
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:40:58PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> prefer to stay away from it, preference perhaps? But with preference
> comes the problem that NM relies on wpasupplicant and a couple of
> other wireless tools that we would absolutely never need on a server,
> unless we are crazy or
I agree with Dylan. Valve is not likely to package their games because
their purpose if I understand well is to make Steam a multi-plateform
distribution software. I think that Ubuntu Software Center could only
integrate their list of software to ease and centralize the search. But it
would probabl
Dale Amon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:40:58PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> > prefer to stay away from it, preference perhaps? But with preference
> > comes the problem that NM relies on wpasupplicant and a couple of
> > other wireless tools that we would absolutely never need on a server,
