On 08/12/2010 08:43 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Till,
>
> Till Kamppeter [2010-08-12 8:22 +0200]:
>> Why does it add 15 MB?
>
> Because I can't read numbers properly. (sorry..)
>
> Wow, this is an amazing reduction!
>
> You introduced 8 MB of savings, so you are of course very entitled to
> pu
On 08/12/2010 08:43 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Till,
>
> Till Kamppeter [2010-08-12 8:22 +0200]:
>> Why does it add 15 MB?
>
> Because I can't read numbers properly. (sorry..)
>
> Wow, this is an amazing reduction!
>
> You introduced 8 MB of savings, so you are of course very entitled to
> pu
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Till Kamppeter
wrote:
> And I have freed another 2.3 MB (60 KB of .debs) in the installed
> system, by applying the PPD compression to splix. /usr/share/ppd is
> below 1 MB now.
You, sir, win one internets! :D
http://www.flickr.com/photos/goopymart/3125898045/in
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2010-August/000744.html
On 12 August 2010 04:43, NoOp wrote:
> Loaded up Maverick Alpha3 a simple test 32bit machine (Intel Motherboard
> 1Ghz/348Mb) with an nVidia NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL] card. All working
> well; get notification for a dr
I wonder what will the new installer install if I check the
"install proprietary software.". Media codecs? Drivers?
A lot of my friends have the broadcom wifi in their laptops, the driver is
shipped with the Ubuntu CD. bcmwl-kernel-source.
Would be great to have it installed automatically if the ha
Why is apache2 in the default Ubuntu install?
I upgraded from 9.10 to 10.04 LTS today, and the upgrade procedure installed
Apache2 onto my box, even though I have had it autoremoved for a long time.
It also did this on another server I upgraded, and that server runs lighttpd
too!
>Selecting pre
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Harry Strongburg wrote:
> Why is apache2 in the default Ubuntu install?
>
It is not AFAIK.
I upgraded from 9.10 to 10.04 LTS today, and the upgrade procedure installed
> Apache2 onto my box, even though I have had it autoremoved for a long time.
>
You might have
"Harry Strongburg" wrote:
>Why is apache2 in the default Ubuntu install?
>
>I upgraded from 9.10 to 10.04 LTS today, and the upgrade procedure installed
>Apache2 onto my box, even though I have had it autoremoved for a long time.
>It also did this on another server I upgraded, and that server
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:34:24PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's not in the default install. Look at the output of aptitude why
> apache2-mpm-prefork to see what pulled it in.
So it just happened to have been auto-installed on all the boxes I upgraded
from 9.10 to 10.04? That's weird.
H
On 08/12/2010 03:18 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2010-August/000744.html
Right... and 2:1.8.99.905-1ubuntu would be included in that? Or would it
primarily be the difference between the updates inlcuded in
2:1.8.99.905-1ubuntu from 2:1.8.1.9
Hi,
Not wishing to get involved in arguments, but an LTS is just that. As apache
is the major market of hhtp [1] it is imprortant for LTS that it will be
able to be supported for five years. This would not be possible with
apache1.
Regards,
Phill
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_HTTP_Server
"Harry Strongburg" wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:34:24PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> It's not in the default install. Look at the output of aptitude why
>> apache2-mpm-prefork to see what pulled it in.
>
>So it just happened to have been auto-installed on all the boxes I upgraded
>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:55:24AM +0100, Phillip Whiteside wrote:
> Not wishing to get involved in arguments, but an LTS is just that. As apache
> is the major market of hhtp [1] it is imprortant for LTS that it will be
> able to be supported for five years. This would not be possible with
> apach
Hello Harry,
Harry Strongburg [2010-08-13 4:55 +]:
> I found out why though, it's packaged with php5, which is also
> pretty stupid to do. If a user installs PHP, they should also
> install any httpd they want. Not Apache automatically.
php5 installs everything related to PHP, which includes
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:15 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 03:18 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2010-August/000744.html
>
> Right... and 2:1.8.99.905-1ubuntu would be included in that? Or would it
> primarily be the difference between the
Although,
In Harry's defence I'd like to point out that using tasksel for a LAMP
installation does at least give you a choice of apache2 or lightpd. So, php
should not really be dragging anything in as a 'depends'. Those wishing to
install LAMP can do so quite easily.
Regards,
Phill.
On Fri, Au
16 matches
Mail list logo
