Hello,
I was trying to use Denemo, and found out that the pc's keyboard doesn't access
the menus by pressing alt+the letter, like f for file, etc. Is there a way of
making Denemo accessible, since it depends on the ATK accessibility toolkit?
Thanks,
André.--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
U
Ryan,
while your first answer demonstrated you are not properly informed on the
technical aspects of either the proper Ubuntu archives or PPAs, this second
one show you don't have any clue about how GetDeb works.
Anyway I was just trying to point you in what I believed to be a better
direction. If
Hello Eric,
Eric Miao [2010-05-31 18:09 +0800]:
> Sorry I brought this topic to such a massive audience. But unfortunately
> upower
> seems to be still linked with libusb-0.1, and thus bug 427805 and numerous
> other
> duplicates are affecting many users. (http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427805)
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> Eric Miao [2010-05-31 18:09 +0800]:
>> Sorry I brought this topic to such a massive audience. But unfortunately
>> upower
>> seems to be still linked with libusb-0.1, and thus bug 427805 and numerous
>> other
>> duplicates are
2010/6/14 Anthony Hook :
> In addition, I can do:
> $ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
> and as far as I know, apt-get does not have this functionality.
$ sudo apt-get upgrade
(as opposed to dist-upgrade, which is called full-upgrade in aptitude).
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Free Softw
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:16 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Rob King wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >Ubuntu's encrypted home directory feature is quite useful, and a good way
> > of increasing the security and privacy of information.
> >However, the scheme i
There is error using "ip" and "route" command when you want to add new route
to ipv6. I experienced similar error programming routing protocol using
netlink.
for 'ip" error: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
for "route" error: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
e.g:
ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 301::1/64
Hi all,
I think it would be a *lot* better to set the reviewer of all ubuntu
branches to ubuntu-sponsors. This would prevent confusion among people
who wish to fix bugs in Ubuntu or merge packages. Such people propose a
merge and the value of reviewer is set to ubuntu-branches, while,
according to
Hi, Martin.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> Micah Gersten [2010-07-07 20:06 -0500]:
>> Forwarding Brian Murray's response from the ubuntu-bugsquad list.
>> As an example there might be a bug about Ubuntu bug reports not being
>> fixed which will not stay in a
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:36:14PM +0200, Francesco Fumanti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also prefer sunbird to lightning: indeed, I am still using the sunbird
> version that shipped with karmic on the development version of Maverick.
>
> If I remember correctly, it is possible to install Sunbird on Lucid
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
> Ryan,
> while your first answer demonstrated you are not properly informed on the
> technical aspects of either the proper Ubuntu archives or PPAs, this second
> one show you don't have any clue about how GetDeb works.
When I was writing that re
Hello!
On Jul 9, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Ryan Oram wrote:
> The only difference is that pbuilder automates a bit more. I
> stand completely corrected.
Actually, the difference is that sbuild uses schroot with LVM snapshots for the
chroot environments. It's quite a nice, elegant system and I prefer i
On Monday, July 05, 2010 11:47:46 Bilal Akhtar wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think it would be a *lot* better to set the reviewer of all ubuntu
> branches to ubuntu-sponsors. This would prevent confusion among people
> who wish to fix bugs in Ubuntu or merge packages. Such people propose a
> merge and the v
On Fri Jul 9 23:08:14 BST 2010, Joshua Timberman wrote:
> Actually, the difference is that sbuild uses schroot with LVM snapshots for
> the chroot environments. It's quite a nice, elegant system and I prefer it to
> pbuilder for developing packages.
Ya, I can definitely see why sbuild would be u
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Ryan Oram wrote:
> On Fri Jul 9 23:08:14 BST 2010, Joshua Timberman wrote:
> > Actually, the difference is that sbuild uses schroot with LVM snapshots
> for the chroot environments. It's quite a nice, elegant system and I prefer
> it to pbuilder for developing pac
On Sat Jul 10 00:34:53 BST 2010, Joao Pinto wrote:
> I am sorry but you are not correct, GetDeb only does packaging when such is
> required, we try to avoid redundant work and package forking. Re-using
> Ubuntu, Debian and PPAs building rules is a requirement if you intend to
> minimize dependency
16 matches
Mail list logo
