On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Shane Fagan
wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:40 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
>> I was discussing this issue with some other members on #ubuntu+1 irc
>> just yesterday. Should aptitude be included in Maverick by default?
>>
>> I can't see any valid reason of why it sh
Hi,
Chris Jones writes:
> I was discussing this issue with some other members on #ubuntu+1 irc
> just yesterday. Should aptitude be included in Maverick by default?
>
> I can't see any valid reason of why it should be. We already have
> apt-get, dpkg and gdebi.
It might be worth pointing out th
On 2010-06-12 00:10:57 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Debian aptitude is at 0.6.2.1-2, while ubuntu's aptitude is at
> 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10
>
> I don't know why there is such a large version difference though and
> how much work needs to be done to merge these two together.
Lucid synced preferra
I've noticed that I constantly get notifications about instant messages,
e-mails, and the like. I've also noticed that Thunderbird uses its own
notification system, which seems to work much better than the one used
by Pidgin et al.
The difference in these two systems is pretty simple and easy
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 14:51 -0400, John Moser wrote:
> I've noticed that I constantly get notifications about instant messages,
> e-mails, and the like. I've also noticed that Thunderbird uses its own
> notification system, which seems to work much better than the one used
> by Pidgin et al.
>
On 06/08/2010 12:08 AM, Robbie Williamson wrote:
> 11.10 UDS - May 9-13 (2011)
We should change this one, the LinuxTag 2011 in Berlin will be on May 11-14.
See http://www.linuxtag.de/.
Till
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
