On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:15:30AM CEST, Chandru wrote:
> The default media players in Ubuntu, though quite capable do not have
> graphical equalizers. Rather than including an equalizer in every
> application, having a system wide equalizer can be very handy especially
> when playing online video
My suggestion was to just get the app into the official repos initially.
Based on Daniel's reply I've sent a mail to the developer suggesting him to
submit the application.
If users find it useful they'd at least be able to install and use it
easily.
--
Chandra Sekar.S
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Chandru wrote:
> My suggestion was to just get the app into the official repos initially.
> Based on Daniel's reply I've sent a mail to the developer suggesting him to
> submit the application.
It would be even more useful to work alongside him to get it into Ma
On 11 May 2010 09:20, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:15:30AM CEST, Chandru wrote:
>> The default media players in Ubuntu, though quite capable do not have
>> graphical equalizers. Rather than including an equalizer in every
>> application, having a system wide equalizer can be
Including a system-wide eq sounds great and all, but it's probably more
difficult than what it initially seems. Especially considering the variety
of codecs and output configs and methods that we all have running. eg.
gstreamer, xine, vlc, mplayer, xmms just to name a few. So I can't see how a
syst
On 11 May 2010 10:20, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> I personally think that users will get confused with an EQ. If they find it,
> adjust something, and find sound is not as good, they will file bugs
> regarding sound problems that they have caused.
>
> I personally think we need to think very very car
Dear all,
I'm a postgraduate student at the University of Leicester and the time has come
for me to do my thesis. This thesis can be in the format of a technical project
and one of the topics that has been proposed for my course has to do with Linux.
More concretely, the idea is that the studen
How about formatting your flash drive as FAT and use it everywhere
without ACL mess?
=)
Alternativly you might be able to achieve this with cunning DeviceKit
/ PolicyKit rules.
I don't see how this can be useful as FUSE because it will be one more
hurdle to jump.
Also I don't understand how can
The last concern is important. The drive is not fixed; all security on
removable media is broken
On May 11, 2010 2:22 PM, "Dmitrijs Ledkovs"
wrote:
How about formatting your flash drive as FAT and use it everywhere
without ACL mess?
=)
Alternativly you might be able to achieve this with cunni
Hi,
in the old days when I didn't have fast Internet connection it was a bit
hard to get ubuntu updated. this is the situation in many parts of the
world.
this bug about this issue and can help solving the problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/572776
and this wiki page to collect the id
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Usama Akkad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the old days when I didn't have fast Internet connection it was a bit
> hard to get ubuntu updated. this is the situation in many parts of the
> world.
>
> this bug about this issue and can help solving the problem
> https://bugs.lau
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Daniel Chen wrote:
> Two thoughts:
> This would entail switching to the master (or trunk) branch of
> upstream git, correct? Maverick currently tracks the stable-queue
> branch.
No, my equalizer is merely a "wrapper" script that takes advantage of
PulseAudio's mod
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Conn O'Griofa wrote:
> [1] This branch may be obsolete now that the equalizer is included
> upstream by default - I haven't followed developments recently. Here
> it is: http://gitorious.org/pulseaudio-equalizer
Right, which is now in the master trunk of upstream
I don't see what FUSE would have to do with anything. The UDF
filesystem has the ability to not store the uid on the media, instead
writing a uid of -1, which it then can map to the currently logged in
interactive user that mounted the disc later. This feature was created
specifically to solve th
I would just like to throw my two cents in and express my own disapproval of
PulseAudio.
It's clunky and hard to configure, and personally I think it rather tries to
do too much at once, and by so doing is latent.
I would not miss it if it were removed from Ubuntu in favor of something
more simpl
Also, I question the wisdom of having audio specific bluetooth support.
My hunches tell me that a proper bluetooth support layer would be better.
2010/5/11 Shentino
> I would just like to throw my two cents in and express my own disapproval
> of PulseAudio.
>
> It's clunky and hard to configure
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:06:10AM CEST, Shentino wrote:
> Also, I question the wisdom of having audio specific bluetooth support.
>
> My hunches tell me that a proper bluetooth support layer would be better.
What do you mean by proper bluetooth support layer? We already have that, and
it does a
17 matches
Mail list logo
