Thanks Scott, thus there is no update procedure in place for pyqt, which
is changing quite rapidly? I got the impression that a lot of people are
using it actively. But them I do not know on what I am intrinsically
asking for in terms of effort.
Thanks,
Heinz Preisig
--
Heinz A Preisig
Profess
David MENTRE wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> 2009/7/21 Scott Kitterman :
>> How long do you expect?
>
> A similar transition took 4 weeks in Debian.
>
Actually, It took 3 weeks :) (considering the rpm transition which
blocked ocaml transition). Hopefully, rpm is now built/installed almost
everywher
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:42:40 +0200 Heinz A Preisig
wrote:
>Thanks Scott, thus there is no update procedure in place for pyqt, which
>is changing quite rapidly? I got the impression that a lot of people are
>using it actively. But them I do not know on what I am intrinsically
>asking for in terms
Dear all,
sorry for crossposting, please notice it before replying to all.
I tend to report all usability bugs I find, in the hope that ubuntu will
become better. The hudred-papercut effort shows that I am not wrong in
reporting those as bugs.
However, it is very easy that a developer does not
Il 22/07/2009 18:47, Vincenzo Ciancia ha scritto:
> Dear all,
>
> sorry for crossposting, please notice it before replying to all.
>
I am possibly a bit of an idiot for what I did, but luckily the other
list which has nothing to do with my target has a moderator.
I generate too much noise. My ap
Agreed. Ubuntu developers either don't understand my usability
reports or tag them as low priority bugs, which gets triaged for many
releases. Once I have submitted a bug report on an usability issue
that caused "information loss", which is serious. In certain PDF
files, I can't search for accente
Il 22/07/2009 19:04, Henrique Almeida ha scritto:
> Agreed. Ubuntu developers either don't understand my usability
> reports or tag them as low priority bugs, which gets triaged for many
> releases.
This is because these are not crashers and typically just affect a small
portion of the applicat
On mer., 2009-07-22 at 18:47 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> However, it is very easy that a developer does not recognise an
> usability-related bug report, and confuses it with a more or less
> strange support request, and I often have to discuss to have it
> accepted
> as a bug.
The issue i
>> However, it is very easy that a developer does not recognise an
>> usability-related bug report, and confuses it with a more or less
>> strange support request, and I often have to discuss to have it
>> accepted as a bug.
>
> The issue is that Ubuntu doesn't write most of the softwares it
> dis
Il 22/07/2009 22:53, Mikus Grinbergs ha scritto:
> Let me suggest that Ubuntu appoint an usability triager/ombudsman,
> to determine (from the Ubuntu users' perspective, not from an Ubuntu
> developers' perspective) how much attention ought to be paid to each
> and every usability-related bug repor
+1, me too, etc...
See the comments in bug 294523 at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/294523
A few users have tried to report/push/discuss for this for a few releases
already but it seems the bug is low priority even though its a usability
pain and that too right at the start of t
One Hundred Paper Cut Method,
After getting tired of reading this list where almost every user request
has been handled with the standard RTFM reply and dismissed as a newbie
error, I decided to look around at various other Linux distributions. I
even went upstream to find out if anyone had a
> Let me suggest that Ubuntu appoint an usability triager/ombudsman,
> to determine (from the Ubuntu users' perspective, not from an Ubuntu
> developers' perspective) how much attention ought to be paid to each
> and every usability-related bug report.
My 2c: I have to whole-heartedly agree. Proba
13 matches
Mail list logo
