Am 10.06.2009 um 21:44 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
>> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
>> has been based around the idea that these files are somehow more
>> important than, say, /bin/sh
>
> Putting the ker
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:20 +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 10.06.2009 um 21:44 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
>
> > ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
> >> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
> >> has been based around the idea that these files are
On 2009/06/11 09:20 (GMT+0200) Markus Hitter composed:
> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
That's asking for trouble, unless only one or fewer installations actually
mount the "/boot" on
David MENTRE a écrit :
> * pycaml: a new version (0.82-10) has been uploaded in Debian which
> should fix the issue with Python 2.6 in Karmic after automatic import.
> I'm waiting for the automatic import.
When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
> The syncs are done automatically on da
Christopher James Halse Rogers writes:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:35 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> John Moser writes:
>>
>> > GRUB2 on its own partition is silly. Like having a separate /boot.
>>
>> It is required for stuff like root on LVM, a configuration supported by
>> the alternate i
On 2009-06-11 01:25:58 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
> > The syncs are done automatically on daily basis until DIF date.
>
> However, pycaml has been uploaded more that 48 hours ago in sid, and it
> has still not been updated in karmic... or may
Olá Przemek e a todos.
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 12:47:24 Przemek Kulczycki wrote:
> What about the forums/answers.lp.net - will the users be able to
> attach apport's reports to forums or support requests?
Apport can be set to do a dry run, and not submit the logs to Launchpad, but
stored local
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
>> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
>> has been based around the idea that these files are somehow more
>> important than, say, /bin/sh
>
> Putting the kernel (i.e., /boot) on a se
Markus Hitter wrote:
> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
No, "really" you don't. I've tried that and it causes as many headaches as
it solves.
--
derek
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailin
Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
> John,
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, John Moser wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Luke L wrote:
>>> How many of these things are actually going to make it into Karmic? A
>>> dynamically sized swap file? GRUB 2 residing on its own partition,
>>> etc? These
On Thursday 11 June 2009 01:19:02 (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> Apport can be set to do a dry run, and not submit the logs to Launchpad, but
> stored locally.
> The user only needs to get them and upload them to where s/he needs them.
> I'm just not sure if this logs are on /tmp or /var/crash
$
> Surely the BIOS doesn't actually have to be involved as long as the initial
> boot stage can find files anywhere on the disk.
>
Guess what loads the inital boot stage?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://li
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ke, 2009-06-10 kello 15:21 -0400, John Moser kirjoitti:
>
>> Every argument for putting Grub or the kernel on a separate partition
>> has been based around the idea that these files are somehow more
>> important than, say, /bin/sh
>>
>
> Putting the kernel (i.e., /bo
2009/6/11 Michael Bienia :
> On 2009-06-11 01:25:58 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
>> > The syncs are done automatically on daily basis until DIF date.
>>
>> However, pycaml has been uploaded more that 48 hours ago in sid, and it
>> has still not
Am 11.06.2009 um 10:35 schrieb Felix Miata:
> On 2009/06/11 09:20 (GMT+0200) Markus Hitter composed:
>
>> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
>> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
>
> That's asking for trouble, unless only one o
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Dmitrijs
Ledkovs wrote:
> Cool =D With my packages it seems that ubuntu autosync is also usually
> triggered after the Debian automatic removal (superseeded packages in
> experimental and etc). Anyways so far I had to wait for autosync 0-7
> days. Plus as far I can
Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> Am 11.06.2009 um 14:47 schrieb Derek Broughton:
>
>> Additionally, if you have more than one installation of Ubuntu on the
>> same platter, you really want to share /boot with both installations.
>
I definitely didn't write that - or if I did, I'm suffering delusions -
Hi,
OT: from OCaml
Looking for "seasoned developer" advice.
I am new to the "Debian world"... I have some packages
that I want to get into the Ubuntu repositories, but getting
them in a the "source" level (e.g. Debian) would be even
better.
How is this done?
I have just started m
Am 11.06.2009 um 21:41 schrieb Derek Broughton:
> Markus Hitter wrote:
>>
>> Am 11.06.2009 um 14:47 schrieb Derek Broughton:
>>
>>> [wrong citation snipped]
>
> I definitely didn't write that - or if I did, I'm suffering
> delusions -
> because I believe, and believe I said, the opposite
D
Taking Luke L's advice here and not using my real name on the internet
anymore due to this insanity.
I've submitted this thread to Reddit this morning:
http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/8rmv5/mono_bashers_take_things_too_far_on_ubuntu_lists/
I'm hoping this will wake some people up to make t
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM, David Schlesinger
wrote:
>
> > PS David, I'm relieved you have such a cool boss and I hope you can enjoy
> > the rest of your sabbatical.
>
> Thanks, whoever-the-heck-you-are, I've been having an excellent time and the
> childishness we've seen here from the likes
On 2009/06/11 20:27 (GMT+0200) Markus Hitter composed:
> Am 11.06.2009 um 10:35 schrieb Felix Miata:
>> Astute multibooters whose other options include a non-Linux OS do _not_
>> place Grub in the MBR. Better to make that the universal default, never
>> addressing via MBR, instead leaving the MBR
>>> Astute multibooters whose other options include a non-Linux OS do _not_
>>> place Grub in the MBR. Better to make that the universal default, never
>>> addressing via MBR, instead leaving the MBR code generic, and using
>>> that generic code with a primary partition containing a Grub that _no_
On 2009/06/12 11:13 (GMT+0800) Christopher Chan composed:
>>> Well, as there is no "generic" MBR, what MBR do you use? The Windows' one?
>>> Mac OS X's, *BSD's?
>> I don't know what '"generic" MBR' is either. I was referring to generic MBR
>> _code_, an optional feature of an openSUSE installatio
Like any other descriptive characters, any name can be penned.
At any rate, mono is useful, there's a few cases I've come across were
mono just did the trick.
Of course as a technology itself, there are pros and cons. I can
advocate for and against mono. About the opportunities that it brings
as
25 matches
Mail list logo
