On Sunday 05 April 2009 08:21:53 Jan Claeys wrote:
> I reported a crash in Synaptic yesterday:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/355415
>
> Now, the "Apport retrace service" invalidated this bug because I don't
> have scrollkeeper installed. But scrollkeeper is deprecated a
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Matt Wheeler wrote:
> 2009/4/4 Nils Kassube :
>>
>> If you don't trust update-manager you would have to check everything
>> after an update. I don't think anybody will do that even after
>> providing the password. Most users don't even know what to look for to
>> ch
raahi 108 wrote:
> I am doing some syslog analysis from various devices.
>
> For Linux, i was trying to find if there is a document listing formats for
> ALL logs that linux sends out...
>
> -e.g. ---
> <92>pure-ftpd: (?...@theman) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [root]
> <38>sshd(p
Op zondag 05-04-2009 om 09:40 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Luka Renko:
> On Sunday 05 April 2009 08:21:53 Jan Claeys wrote:
> > I reported a crash in Synaptic yesterday:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/355415
> >
> > Now, the "Apport retrace service" invalidated this bu
Luka Renko [2009-04-05 9:40 +0200]:
> This sounds very similar to the this bug I reported recently:
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/341358
Indeed it is the same reason. I'll work on this ASAP.
At least the impact is not that big, since it only rejects those
crashes if the retrace is really unusable
Hello,
I've been following discussion on new design features and bugs, and just
downloaded Jaunty beta to check things out. It's a great difference from
Hardy, which is what I still use. I didn't see the face of Intrepid, so
I don't know how much of the difference is actually from Jaunty, but
ma
2009/4/5 John McCabe-Dansted :
Adding something like
%sudo ALL=NOPASSWD: aptitude update
to the sudoers gives almost the right rights. If there is no user
input into aptitude, then this does not add any new such security
holes.
/usr/bin/aptitude would be safer, but yes.
However, Update-mana
On Sunday 05 April 2009 7:15:20 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> Still, an overnight auto-update seems like a sensible default for
> novice users who don't need or want to know what an update is. This is
> what I set my computer too when I am overseas and leave my computer on
> for family to use.
T
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> There's already an option in System -> Administration -> Software sources to
> have updates installed automatically. There's also cron (the reason my mom's
> computer gets updates at all).
Are there any problems with enabling automatic up
2009/4/5 Remco
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Mackenzie Morgan
> wrote:
> > There's already an option in System -> Administration -> Software sources
> to
> > have updates installed automatically. There's also cron (the reason my
> mom's
> > computer gets updates at all).
>
> Are there any p
2009/4/5 Remco
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Mackenzie Morgan
> wrote:
> > There's already an option in System -> Administration -> Software sources
> to
> > have updates installed automatically. There's also cron (the reason my
> mom's
> > computer gets updates at all).
>
> Are there any p
On Sunday 05 April 2009 4:45:38 pm Remco wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > There's already an option in System -> Administration -> Software sources
to
> > have updates installed automatically. There's also cron (the reason my
mom's
> > computer gets updates a
Remco escreveu:
> Are there any problems with enabling automatic updates by default?
> Most users don't care about updates to the point that they never
> install them. And even if they would open the update manager, they
>
Which is precisely why security should be *enforced* by the system.
> Th
i want to see tooltips when hovering files with the mouse, in nautilus,
pleasee!!
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:52 PM, solaris manzur wrote:
> i want to see tooltips when hovering files with the mouse, in nautilus,
> pleasee!!
>
This is known upstream. You can follow the progress here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147642
But please don't spam the
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
> Remco escreveu:
> > Are there any problems with enabling automatic updates by default?
> > Most users don't care about updates to the point that they never
> > install them. And even if they would open the update manager, they
> >
> Which
Op zondag 05-04-2009 om 17:10 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Mackenzie
Morgan:
> The only trouble is that some updates stop services. Hal may need to
> be restarted, and if Firefox isn't restarted after an update it breaks
> royally.
Actually, a running firefox shows you a warning and a restart bu
Op zondag 05-04-2009 om 22:45 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Remco:
> Are there any problems with enabling automatic updates by default?
I'd suggest, if we implement this, that automatic (security) updates are
*ALWAYS* delayed until something like 24h-36h after the release. That
gives us the time
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>> Are there any problems with enabling automatic updates by default?
>> Most users don't care about updates to the point that they never
>> install them. And even if they would open the update manager, they
>> would more likely just install
On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:55:10 pm Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op zondag 05-04-2009 om 17:10 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Mackenzie
> Morgan:
> > The only trouble is that some updates stop services. Hal may need to
> > be restarted, and if Firefox isn't restarted after an update it breaks
> > royally.
>
Op maandag 06-04-2009 om 00:43 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Mackenzie
Morgan:
> On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:55:10 pm Jan Claeys wrote:
> > Actually, a running firefox shows you a warning and a restart button (or
> > at least it did?) if it's older than the on-disk version. I guess
> > that's part
21 matches
Mail list logo
