On Friday 20 March 2009 16:18:25 Vishal Rao wrote:
> Any chance of k3b-for-kde4 getting into jaunty before the release as
> part of kubuntu's move to eliminate kde3 deps?
> Or is it no point waiting for it since it might not be done by April?
> Or is it too late already with feature freeze past?
>
(resending since it bounced because i wasnt subscribed to
kubuntu-devel, apologies for the spam)
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vishal Rao wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Luka Renko wrote:
>> On Friday 20 March 2009 16:18:25 Vishal Rao wrote:
>>> Any chance of k3b-for-kde4 getting in
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Luka Renko wrote:
> On Friday 20 March 2009 16:18:25 Vishal Rao wrote:
>> Any chance of k3b-for-kde4 getting into jaunty before the release as
>> part of kubuntu's move to eliminate kde3 deps?
>> Or is it no point waiting for it since it might not be done by April?
By the way, as "innocent bystander" of all this disscussion, I wanted
to check out that icon which was replacement of new NM zero signal
strength icon (as I understood, design team overlook decision of using
it and provided better alternative), but I really can't find it. It
doesn't appear in upgra
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> That would fail for users who make one-time changes to their data. For
> example users who download their mail via pop. If they upgrade using
> aufs and then proceed to test the new features of their mail client,
> it might be configured to downl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Vishal Rao wrote:
> The install failed with "newer version already installed" because I
> earlier updated and got 2.6.28-11 from main.
> I doubt the hw_ptr fixes are in main, if not, will you build new
> packages with updated vers
Op vrijdag 20-03-2009 om 17:48 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Matthew
Paul Thomas:
> Yep. We're very pleased that there are OEMs selling computers with
> Ubuntu pre-installed, so that millions more people are using Free
> Software. And we're happy to accept feedback from those OEMs on
> problems
> t
Op vrijdag 20-03-2009 om 05:07 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Daniel T
Chen:
> We're all aware that the migration to PulseAudio has been less than
> smooth. I don't need to explain that several glaring audio aberration
> and stability symptoms remain in current Jaunty. The good news is that
> ther
I am running ubuntu 8.10 on a Tyan workstation with 16 cores, 32GB of
ram and a 3Ware 8.9TB raid 5 array. Under Fedora, when I run fsck, the
output is:
Disk /dev/sda: 8999.9 GB, 834099456 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1094179 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
R
2009/3/22 don fisher
> I am running ubuntu 8.10 on a Tyan workstation with 16 cores, 32GB of
> ram and a 3Ware 8.9TB raid 5 array.
And your filesystem is...?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
2009/3/22 don fisher
> I never got to make one under ubuntu. I could not make a partition above
> 200GB. parted yielded same small size. I was using xfs under Fedora.
>
> sudo mkfs.xfs -b size=4k -d su=64k,sw=7 -i size=2k -l version=2 -f -s
> size=4k -L raid8 /dev/sda1
>
> don
--
Ubuntu-devel-di
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:17 PM, don fisher wrote:
> Disk /dev/sda: 8999.9 GB, 834099456 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1094179 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Rebooting under ubuntu the output is reported as:
>
> Disk /dev/sda1: 203.8 GB, 203835590656 b
12 matches
Mail list logo
