Chris Cheney [2009-02-26 14:04 -0600]:
> For the netbook and higher end (and newer) laptop case where dpi can be
> up to 150dpi users will see a definite increase in size of the fonts.
> The size of the fonts will now be the proper size according to what they
> claim to be. The font size could be s
Olá David e a todos.
On Thursday 26 February 2009 11:54:54 David Barth wrote:
> (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> The popups we're displaying (update manager is an example) are set with
> set_focus_on_map to FALSE, which means they shouldn't steal the focus.
>
> This was recently added to the deve
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:53:06AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Thus I think we should not (only) base the font size on dpi, but
> rather on the physical size of the screen. Does anyone know whether
> the reported (EDID) physical size of the monitor is reliable on may
(I assume you meant "many")
>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 06:53:18AM -0500, Eric Appleman wrote:
> I believe that we should toss aside our morals and break with Debian in
> order to do this. If not, then ext4 support really doesn't belong in
> Jaunty.
Everyone gets far too worked up about this stuff. :-) I don't think
anyone eve
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:15:37AM +0100, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Colin Watson ha scritto:
> > In future please file a new bug rather than doing that. It makes our
> > lives much more difficult when people tag along to an existing ubiquity
> > bug; it's actually quite difficult for users to tell
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:27:31PM -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009 7:20:54 pm Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> > I will surely do what Colin asked me for any other ubiquity report,
> > but I don't think that I am supposed to do this for ordinary, non
> > hardware-related pack
Marius Gedminas [2009-02-27 15:11 +0200]:
> (I assume you meant "many")
Whoops, yes.
> Since the X server uses EDID-reported physical size to determine the
> DPI, it's at least as precise as basing the font size on DPI alone, no?
Oh, is that really so? I had assumed that the monitor reports its
2009/2/26 Chris Cheney :
> [...] personally I think they are already fine [...]
I don't agree. Having fonts as displayed in
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23152448/10pt.jpg is clearly not right
and would make, IMHO, a awful first impression.
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss m
hi there,
i would like to be taken off from this list, could you help me please ?
thx in advance
«Les opportunités apparaissent le plus souvent sous la forme de malchance ou
d’échec temporaire.»
Napoléon HILL
--- En date de : Ven 27.2.09, Steve Langasek a
écrit :
De: Steve Langasek
Objet:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Sandy Hary RARIVOSON wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i would like to be taken off from this list, could you help me please ?
> thx in advance
You quote a message from ubuntu-devel-announce, so I'm guessing you
want to unsubscribe from that list? If so, do it here:
https:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolò Chieffo wrote on 26/02/09 21:01:
>
> For all of you who does not have a 121 DPI laptop, and said that the
> font size is good as it is, make sure to have a look at my screenshots
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23152437/8pt.jpg
> http://launchp
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 02:55 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2009/02/26 21:12 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:08 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> On 2009/02/26 19:15 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
>
> >> >> On 26/02/09 14:31, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> >> Real-w
Olá Chow e a todos.
On Thursday 26 February 2009 14:28:01 Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> Yes, so regarding this issue, why don't we make s2disk the default for
> pm-utils? It does seem to have more benefits than the plain old kernel method.
For me it has been safe, but according to the guys on #ubuntu-d
Olá Surfaz e a todos.
On Thursday 26 February 2009 16:35:40 Surfaz Gemon Meme wrote:
> sudo cp libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/
Is it there or on:
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
--
Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com)
(``-_-´´) http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net
Li
Olá Mackenzie e a todos.
On Thursday 26 February 2009 18:59:28 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> I have a 1280x800 13" screen, and the fonts look fine to me.
Hi have a 13" at 1280x800 (DPI 112 according to xorg log) and I have to
increase mine, but I dont see as good as I used to.
--
Hi, I'm BUGabundo
FYI;
Valgrind 3.4.0 introduces a really neat feature for finding the reason behind
those
pesky "jump/move depends on unintialized memory" errors.
What this new feature does is that it prints the _origin_ of the undefined value
instead of printing a warning when that value is _used_. Normally the
Olá Ryan e a todos.
On Thursday 26 February 2009 19:50:06 Ryan Hayle wrote:
> but you will need to measure it yourself to be 100% sure. Just divide 1280
> and 800 by the width and height (in
> inches), respectively, to get your DPI values.
$ xdpyinfo |grep resolution
resolution:112x112
On 27/02/09 10:09, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Fortunately most web designers are smart enough not to use px for fonts.
Have you tried to browse the web much with Firefox set to a high DPI?
Maybe it's just way more noticeable for me at 150dpi, but at least half
the sites I visit look terrible! There
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 16:28 +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> Olá Mackenzie e a todos.
>
> On Thursday 26 February 2009 18:59:28 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > I have a 1280x800 13" screen, and the fonts look fine to me.
>
> Hi have a 13" at 1280x800 (DPI 112 according to xorg log) and I have t
On 2009/02/27 10:47 (GMT-0600) Ryan Hayle composed:
> On 27/02/09 10:09, Chris Cheney wrote:
>> Fortunately most web designers are smart enough not to use px for fonts.
I'm not so sure it's reached 50% yet, particularly for shopping carts. For
those that have changed away, most have not switched
On 2009/02/27 10:09 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 02:55 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>> These may not be the best around, but even if they're off by 50%, the real
>> world still hasn't been anywhere near constant for the past 5 years:
>> http://www.w3schools.com/browsers
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:55 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2009/02/27 10:09 (GMT-0600) Chris Cheney composed:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 02:55 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> These may not be the best around, but even if they're off by 50%, the real
> >> world still hasn't been anywhere near c
22 matches
Mail list logo
