Hi,
> I think it's appropriate to go with a fixed-width theme for the
> documentation site because content here is meant to be read as a page.
> The wiki formating should be adjusted to generally work at this width.
> Consistency with ubuntu.com is also a plus!
I disagree - the problem with fixed
Hi guys,
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 23:09 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Jordan Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a very nice theme and looks more professional and usable to
> > me. My only complaint is that it's rather narrow on all my computers
> > (widescre
I don't like fixed width pages personally (my computer should do what I
want, not what someone else wants me to want), but you can appease more
reasonable people by changing "width: NNNpx" statements to "width: NNem"
or "max-width: NNem".
Using "em" rather than "px" fixes the width at a certain nu
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Remco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This gives you an "ie6.css" file that's rendered in all IEs before IE7,
> > and an ie7.css that's rendered in all IEs before IE8. IE8 allegedly
> > won't need its own file of special cases, but it should be obvious how
> > to ex
> This gives you an "ie6.css" file that's rendered in all IEs before IE7,
> and an ie7.css that's rendered in all IEs before IE8. IE8 allegedly
> won't need its own file of special cases, but it should be obvious how
> to extend the technique if you find that's not the case. This technique
> is b
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:56, Matthew East wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I've been developing a new theme which is intended to replace
> the existing themes on the documentation wiki
> (https://help.ubuntu.com/community). The intention of the theme is to
> make reading the wiki easier for a user (
Thank you everyone for your comments so far.
I've already made changes to my branch which address some of the
comments. I can't reply individually to each suggestion but I'm
considering them all.
Please keep them coming!
--
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
--
Ubuntu-d
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jordan Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Peteris Krisjanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Btw, a slight offtopic from this message, but does it mean that there
>> will be no network-admin from g-s-t in Ibex?
>>
>> Would be very sad if
2008/9/7 Wouter Stomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jordan Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Peteris Krisjanis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Btw, a slight offtopic from this message, but does it mean that there
>>> will be no network-admi
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 22:27 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> So far I am very nervous
> about ditching network-admin, because no matter how it was stuck in
> development, or it lacked features, it worked,
It worked? When? I don't remember this. Was this back during Breezy
or earlier?
Probabl
Hello,
I just tried the effect of profiling the boot sequence by adding
profile to the kernel line in grub, and the effects were amazing! From
1:21 (average of 3 boots) to 58 seconds (again average of 3). That is
a reduction of about 25%! And this was on a system that was just
installed a few days
2008/9/8 Wouter Stomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I just tried the effect of profiling the boot sequence by adding
> profile to the kernel line in grub, and the effects were amazing! From
> 1:21 (average of 3 boots) to 58 seconds (again average of 3).
I tried it and the speedup was only from 0:37 to 0
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 10:27:10PM +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
> Btw, I haven't seen that system wide configuration on OpenSUSE and
> Fedora. I would like to see it in action. So far I am very nervous
> about ditching network-admin, because no matter how it was stuck in
> development, or it la
13 matches
Mail list logo
