Re: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround

2008-02-19 Thread Martijn van de Streek
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > Pressing the delete key with something highlighted uses the regular "send to > trash" instead of that, though, I think. You can use shift+delete to remove and skip the trash. > I fail to see how ignoring Nautilus's existence in favor of using one >

Re: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround

2008-02-19 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On 19/02/2008 Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > It's part of why I don't use file managers press shift+canc and live happy :) Vincenzo -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-deve

Gnome un-aware file handling (was: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround)

2008-02-19 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 19.02.2008 um 04:41 schrieb Jared Schlicht: > The goal with desktop distros seems to be "The user should not have > to touch > the command line". This might be a valid goal but doesn't work very often. Many, many applications are not Gnome-aware and it's impossible for them to open a fi

Re: Gnome un-aware file handling (was: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround)

2008-02-19 Thread Aurélien Naldi
On Feb 19, 2008 12:35 PM, Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 19.02.2008 um 04:41 schrieb Jared Schlicht: > > > The goal with desktop distros seems to be "The user should not have > > to touch > > the command line". > > This might be a valid goal but doesn't work very often. Many, many

HAL fix for multiple battaries

2008-02-19 Thread Ted Gould
So, here is the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/177570 Basically with the .24 kernel there are sysfs and proc interfaces for many batteries making it so that HAL reports two, and thus GPM reports two. There is a link to a patch in upstream HAL that fixes t

Re: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround

2008-02-19 Thread A. Walton
On Feb 17, 2008 8:11 PM, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > alias rm="mv --force --target-directory=$HOME/.Trash/" > alias rmdir="mv --force --target-directory=$HOME/.Trash/" [/snip] And of course, that would break any script that needs to use rm to deal with a file, filling your trash di

Re: Gnome un-aware file handling (was: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround)

2008-02-19 Thread A. Walton
On Feb 19, 2008 6:52 AM, Aurélien Naldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 19, 2008 12:35 PM, Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Am 19.02.2008 um 04:41 schrieb Jared Schlicht: > > > > > The goal with desktop distros seems to be "The user should not have > > > to touch > > > the comma

libc_p.a under Gutsy (7.10) (32 bit version) causes floating exception under gcc

2008-02-19 Thread Richard Pember
Hi, I'm trying to profile a code that's I/O intensive and so I would like to use the profiling version of the C library, libc_p.a. In a nutshell, executables compiled with gcc with -p (or -pg) and linked with libc_p.a have a floating point exception right out the gate. (I also have the Intel C com

Re: [coreboot] Fwd: mkelfImage

2008-02-19 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On 2/19/08, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Roman Kononov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080219 16:12]: > > On 2008-02-19 07:36 Stefan Reinauer said the following: > >> any details? I had no problems compiling it with GNU C Library stable > >> release version 2.7 (20071106) > >> gcc version 4.

Re: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround

2008-02-19 Thread Michael T
Wouldn't the solution for this just be to add a couple of extra utilities, like e.g. srm (== saferm)? This provides the functionality without breaking anything. The utilities could also be aliases. Regards, Michael On 20.02.2008 02:57 "A. Walton" wrote: On Feb 17, 2008 8:11 PM, Vincent wrot

Re: UNDELETION EXT3 workaround

2008-02-19 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ti, 2008-02-19 at 20:57 -0500, A. Walton wrote: > On Feb 17, 2008 8:11 PM, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > alias rm="mv --force --target-directory=$HOME/.Trash/" > > alias rmdir="mv --force --target-directory=$HOME/.Trash/" > [/snip] > > And of course, that would break any scrip

Re: HAL fix for multiple battaries

2008-02-19 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Ted, Ted Gould [2008-02-19 14:31 -0800]: > So, here is the bug: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/177570 > > Basically with the .24 kernel there are sysfs and proc interfaces for > many batteries making it so that HAL reports two, and thus GPM reports > tw