Re: metashell - User Friendly Shell

Hi, On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:10:58PM +, Fergal Daly wrote: > On 27/01/2008, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:01:56AM +, Fergal Daly wrote: > > > Seems like you could achieve much the same thing by having command > > > (let's call it "o" for open so it

Re: Alpha 4 freeze ahead

When is Firefox 3 (Beta) going to be in the default hardy install? We plan on shipping Firefox 3, so why not include it by default early on to get more testing? Thanks, Bryan On Jan 25, 2008 11:47 AM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Ubuntu developers, > > The expected release d

Re: metashell - User Friendly Shell

On 27/01/2008, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 04:10:58PM +, Fergal Daly wrote: > > On 27/01/2008, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:01:56AM +, Fergal Daly wrote: > > > > Seems like you could achieve much the sam

Re: metashell - User Friendly Shell

Hi, On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:33:55AM +, Fergal Daly wrote: > On 27/01/2008, Forest Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are you advocating the creation of a program called "open"? > > No, I said "alternatives-based". That is, using the Debian > alternatives system to provide access to one pre