2007/9/14, Wenzhuo Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Having just seen the slashdot story about the decision to ship Gutsy with
> Compiz enabled by default, I'd like to request here to provide a boot option
> and an installation option to disable Compiz compositing. I am one of the
> users who will be
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyopengl/+bug/135736
Please test... this is killing me :(
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
For a long time, I used to use Fedora exclusively. The cleaner more
user friendly Ubuntu desktop has been much better for me as a consultant
in every way sans one. Remote update between versions.
Here is how I would do this in Fedora:
First I would go to a server, and dump the contents of the c
I just sent a remote install process inquiry, but I have a second
semi-related idea I would like to begin working on and contribute. If I
do this right (a rarity for me), these two ideas could be combined into
one...
One of the holly grails of enterprise network management is data and
system reco
I find that Debian is the most consistent through upgrades, if no
strange customisations have been made then "apt-get dist-upgrade" can go
from version to version no problem.
Ubuntu introduces some issues with this that makes the update manager
and metapackages like ubuntu-desktop needed. I have p
hi,
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 10:43 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fries:
> The version upgrade process from one version of Ubuntu to another has
> been troublesome for the most part. I am beginning to trust it less and
> less.
did you use the update-manager way [1] as we recommend for that or plain
apt-
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 19:20 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 10:43 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fries:
> > The version upgrade process from one version of Ubuntu to another has
> > been troublesome for the most part. I am beginning to trust it less and
> > less.
> did you
I have some ideas I can put forwards with regard to backups on linux
enterprise networks I envisage the following:
* Avahi based service which lets all computers on the network know
there is a backup system or systems in place.
* Ability to boot from the same or different machine via network or
Chris,
You are right, but the problem is actually at the core of the DEB/APT
system. It will not get fixed any time soon. And for the record, RPM
is not any better, it suffers from the same problem.
The core of the issue stems from the fact that software exists in a
n-dimension matrix. This ma
2007/9/14, Kevin Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The easiest way around the problem is a fresh install. The problem is
> Debian (and thus Ubuntu) does not make this easy. I feel that stealing
> the reinstall procedures from Fedora could resolve this problem without
> resorting to overhauling the APT
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:33 -0600, Kevin Fries wrote:
> Chris,
>
> You are right, but the problem is actually at the core of the DEB/APT
> system. It will not get fixed any time soon. And for the record, RPM
> is not any better, it suffers from the same problem.
>
> The core of the issue stems
Kevin Fries wrote:
> For a long time, I used to use Fedora exclusively. The cleaner more
> user friendly Ubuntu desktop has been much better for me as a consultant
> in every way sans one. Remote update between versions.
>
> Here is how I would do this in Fedora:
> Step nine, I would wait for
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:43:32AM -0600, Kevin Fries wrote:
> Here is how I would do this in Fedora:
[... snip a bunch of deep dark Fedora magic ...]
> The version upgrade process from one version of Ubuntu to another has
> been troublesome for the most part.
Are you really serious? "do-release
Since installing Dapper for several clients I've been wondering about
the path they need to take to migrate to the next LTS. (I realise that
there is a whole different discussion here about whether they should
upgrade or not - but at some stage that discussion stops when security
upgrades are no lo
On Friday 14 September 2007 22:43, Onno Benschop wrote:
> Now I understand that resources are limited and that we're a little way
> away from needing this functionality, but if I look back at the gap
> between Edgy and Feisty, it was all over way too soon, so I suspect that
> it would be useful to
15 matches
Mail list logo
