Hello dear Ubuntu community,
Here I want to propose the development of
Ubuntu Metadistribution
Motivation
There is not only Linux as a free operating system. There are other free
operating systems which have their own strength and advantages.
The Ubuntu Metadistribution would combine the ad
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:47:16PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello dear Ubuntu community,
>
> Here I want to propose the development of
>
>
> Ubuntu Metadistribution
Your description roughly matches the way that Ubuntu is already structured.
That is, I don't see any work to be done on
Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu repos.
I would really like to see it better maintained, and I am willing to work on
it, but I don't really know where/how to begin. If anyone has any use
On 4/19/07, shirish agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>I have made a launchpad entry
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+spec/segmented-downloading
> with the wiki entry at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/metalink
> giving the details. I'm no developer but all the links ha
tephens comcast.net> writes:
>
> Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
> occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu
> repos.
> I would really like to see it better maintained, and I am willing to work
> on
> it, but I don't really k
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:20:01PM +0800, Wenzhuo Zhang wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. However, I knew that hda becomes sda when using
> the linux-ata drivers instead of the good old IDE drivers. My problem is
> that the primary boot drive is recognized as sdb, and Grub gets installed
> onto the
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> No, I don't think that the ordering of devices is a bug - the bug is
> that we're assuming that the Linux device ordering bears some sort of
> relation to the Bios device ordering, which is simply not true. Further,
Perhaps it is not a bug as far as the kernel is concer
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:09:04AM +0800, Wenzhuo Zhang wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > No, I don't think that the ordering of devices is a bug - the bug is
> > that we're assuming that the Linux device ordering bears some sort of
> > relation to the Bios device ordering, which is simply not
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 15:29 -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
>
> tephens comcast.net> writes:
> >
> > Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
> > occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu
> > repos.
> > I would really like to see it better
On Friday April 20 2007 5:29:19 pm Jordan Mantha wrote:
>
>
> tephens comcast.net> writes:
> > Is anyone developing texlive? It seems that no one really works on it;
> > occasionally one of the devs sticks the debian package in the ubuntu
> > repos.
> > I would really like to see it better maint
> > 3. Transitions. I think gutsy will mostly likely see a tetex -> texlive
> > 2007 transition although I haven't seen any specs are talk about that.
> > Maybe a good topic of discussion?
>
> Debian/sid has already transitioned, so won't gutsy automatically pick
> this up unless otherwise preven
>
> Your description roughly matches the way that Ubuntu is already structured.
Yes, it matches the way Ubuntu is structured. But - as you know - Ubuntu is
GNU/Linux
today. The first new proposal of me was to get other free operating systems
under Ubuntu's
project.
> That is, I don't see any
12 matches
Mail list logo
