On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:32:42PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 16:44 +0100, John Nilsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 11:25 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> > > Best option you have is to create a patched alternative
> > > ubuntu-desktop package with your own packages.
> >
Ubuntu developers:
Why is the specification mentioned in [
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/system-directory-approach ]
and [
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/userfriendly-filesystem-structure]
"oft-rejected"? Granted, these proposals are not very thought-out or
defined,
Canonical could still support their official packages. If users
installed
something else on their own, that is their business. Is this not already
the case with supported desktops?
I also wonder which is easier: making many packages co-installable
(for all future releases) or adding the propos
