On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:27:12PM -0400, Bill Filler wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know if there is work underway in usplash to support
> resolutions such as 1024x600 and 1280x800 (without stretching the
> image), which are proving to be quite common in the netbook space? If
> not, any hints as
Op dinsdag 22-07-2008 om 22:10 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Oliver
Grawert:
> it would be awesome to have usplash doing more than it does now and
> would surely be appreciated by all of us if you sent a patch, just make
> sure that it doesnt break on the arches it runs on now (usplash
> supporting
Op dinsdag 22-07-2008 om 17:44 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Michael R.
Head:
> Recent mailman versions have learned to only send one by default, so
> it is necessary to configure it each time I sign up for a new mailing
> list.
This default depends on the list admin. I configure it to (by defau
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 22:20 +0100, Alexander Jones wrote:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2008-July/thread.html
>
> Threading is intact, and the mailing list manager knows when I have
> Cc'd someone who is already on its list. You don't receive the same
> email twice fo
Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 22:20 +0100 schrieb Alexander Jones:
> 2008/7/22 Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2008-July/thread.html
>
> Threading is intact, and the mailing list manager knows when I have
> Cc'd someone who is already on
Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
> Well, Red Hat is dropping that splash (rhgb) in favour of Plymouth
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjU3OA
>
Thanz for the link. Though I'm sad to say this looks like another sad
example of FLOSS design. :(
There's no mention on the design of the
2008/7/22 Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi,
> Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 21:00 +0100 schrieb Alexander Jones:
>> I'll dig into the code this evening and see what I can find.
>>
>> (Also, Reply to All is better because the people who I am replying to
>> have their names directly in the hea
Cory K. pisze:
Alexander Jones wrote:
WHY are we using a giant image? The only image we need is the small
Ubuntu logo. We should center it on a black background and be done
with it.
Well there's the great design thinking right there.
If that needs changes to Usplash, let's do it!
There'
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 21:00 +0100 schrieb Alexander Jones:
> I'll dig into the code this evening and see what I can find.
>
> (Also, Reply to All is better because the people who I am replying to
> have their names directly in the header.)
but it breaks reply to list for everyone using
I'll dig into the code this evening and see what I can find.
(Also, Reply to All is better because the people who I am replying to
have their names directly in the header.)
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://list
>> Why would it be an oval?
> it wouldnt if usplash would act like you describe below (which it doesnt)
> to achieve what you describe usplash needs code changes and someon who
> actually does them :)
We were already at that point. You were responding to Alexander's
post, which already recognized
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 15:04 -0400 schrieb Joe Terranova:
> > you miss the point a bit here, even in that case the logo would be oval
> > instead of being a cycle, it's about the stretching that happens
>
> Why would it be an oval?
it wouldnt if usplash would act like you describe b
> you miss the point a bit here, even in that case the logo would be oval
> instead of being a cycle, it's about the stretching that happens
Why would it be an oval?
a 300x200 logo
on a 800x600 monitor, an 800x600 black background is generated, and
the 300x200 logo overlaid on it (placed ac
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 19:27 +0100 schrieb Alexander Jones:
>> WHY are we using a giant image? The only image we need is the small
>> Ubuntu logo. We should center it on a black background and be done
>> with i
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 19:27 +0100 schrieb Alexander Jones:
> WHY are we using a giant image? The only image we need is the small
> Ubuntu logo. We should center it on a black background and be done
> with it. If that needs changes to Usplash, let's do it!
you miss the point a bit here, e
Alexander Jones wrote:
> WHY are we using a giant image? The only image we need is the small
> Ubuntu logo. We should center it on a black background and be done
> with it.
Well there's the great design thinking right there.
> If that needs changes to Usplash, let's do it!
>
There's been chan
WHY are we using a giant image? The only image we need is the small
Ubuntu logo. We should center it on a black background and be done
with it. If that needs changes to Usplash, let's do it!
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 13:27 -0400 schrieb Bill Filler:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know if there is work underway in usplash to support
> resolutions such as 1024x600 and 1280x800 (without stretching the
> image), which are proving to be quite common in the netbook space? If
> not, any hin
Hello,
Does anyone know if there is work underway in usplash to support
resolutions such as 1024x600 and 1280x800 (without stretching the
image), which are proving to be quite common in the netbook space? If
not, any hints as to the efforts of adding this support would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
19 matches
Mail list logo
