Hi all,
I agree with both of you. Although I would like to point out two
threads on ubuntuforums which might interest you both as well.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=965879
and
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=969368
I am well aware that it might not make Jaunty but make Ja
At any rate, regardless of whether we use it or not, making a bug in
Launchpad is not going to change the course of action. My point was that
Shirish should have first checked with the handful of core-devs and kernel
devs who have a good understanding of filesystem development in the kernel
tree, b
John,
2.6.28 will come out around January and Jaunty will probably ship with
2.6.29 but it very well might not be a good idea to use it by default
for Jaunty which is what shirish seemed to be talking about. Just
because it is not considered development status doesn't necessarily mean
it is stable
Please stop filing nonsense bugs without first understanding the situation.
ext4 will become the default filesystem once upstream recommends it for
adoption (i.e. 2.6.28). GRUB still does not support reading ext4 so we will
probably need a separate /boot on ext2/ext3, or wait for one of the SoC
pro
Hi all,
I made a tracking bug for having ext4 as the primary filesystem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/293465
Perhaps the description and stuff can be overhauled.
As a simple generic desktop user having an online defragger and better
journaling, data integrity is
