2010/4/16 Flávio Etrusco :
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
>> Op zondag 11-04-2010 om 11:12 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jérôme
>> Bouat:
>>> Nowadays are the screens mostly lcd/led with fast resume.
>>
>> Turning on an LCD screen that's connected with an analog cable might
>
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op zondag 11-04-2010 om 11:12 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jérôme
> Bouat:
>> Nowadays are the screens mostly lcd/led with fast resume.
>
> Turning on an LCD screen that's connected with an analog cable might
> take several seconds to "settle".
Op zondag 11-04-2010 om 11:12 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jérôme
Bouat:
> Nowadays are the screens mostly lcd/led with fast resume.
Turning on an LCD screen that's connected with an analog cable might
take several seconds to "settle".
--
Jan Claeys
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubun
On 2010/04/15 14:07 (GMT-0700) Brandon Kuczenski composed:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> It should default to infinite, leaving users who want it to choose what suits
>> them best. Not too many things irritate me more than having the phone or some
>> other interruption while installing, and having the
Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2010/04/15 16:14 (GMT-0400) Jérôme Bouat composed:
>
>> The default sleep delay of the screen is set to 30 minutes when
>> operating on mains.
>
>> I think it is too long because :
>
>> - Nowadays are the screens using mostly the lcd/led technology with fast
>> resume.
On 2010/04/15 16:14 (GMT-0400) Jérôme Bouat composed:
> The default sleep delay of the screen is set to 30 minutes when
> operating on mains.
> I think it is too long because :
> - Nowadays are the screens using mostly the lcd/led technology with fast
> resume.
> - The cost of the energy will
> I don't even know the number of users in
> the different countries around the world,
> but I don't think all of them have lcd's.
I mean that there is now a low ratio of CRT among the screens.
I think the users which have a CRT don't have cheap electricity/power at
the same time and would al
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:14:05 +0200
Jérôme Bouat wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> The default sleep delay of the screen is set to 30 minutes when
> operating on mains.
>
>
> I think it is too long because :
>
> - Nowadays are the screens using mostly the lcd/led technology with fast
> resume.
>
> - T
Hello,
The default sleep delay of the screen is set to 30 minutes when
operating on mains.
I think it is too long because :
- Nowadays are the screens using mostly the lcd/led technology with fast
resume.
- The cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary sour
Nowadays are the screens mostly lcd/led with fast resume.
Maybe a good tradeoff would be 20 minutes (it is currently 30 minutes on
lucid beta2).
For the few remaining CRT screens, the tweak of the preferences would
impact only a few users.
Erik Andersen a écrit :
> (reply bottom posted)
>
>
(reply bottom posted)
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:17, Jérôme Bouat wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I think the default sleep delay of the screen is too long when operating
> on mains (30 minutes).
>
> The cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
> the primary source is).
>
> I think t
Hello,
I think the default sleep delay of the screen is too long when operating
on mains (30 minutes).
The cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary source is).
I think this default delay could be decreased to 10 minutes.
Regards.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss m
12 matches
Mail list logo