Re: Ubuntu artwork. Where has it gone?

Thanks guys. I'll take a look tomorrow. Cheers. -- Chris Jones Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer ABN: 98 317 740 240 Photo Resolutions - Photo Printing, Editing and Restorations Web: http://photoresolutions.freehostia.com Email: or Fedora Design Suite Developer and Co-M

Re: Ubuntu artwork. Where has it gone?

You can find them under the toolkit section at . Cheers, On 6 July 2010 02:25, Chris Jones wrote: > I am adding a logo and link to Ubuntu (and Fedora) on my website in > support of FOSS. I don't know whether I'm stupid or not, but where > have the official PNG and S

Ubuntu artwork. Where has it gone?

I am adding a logo and link to Ubuntu (and Fedora) on my website in support of FOSS. I don't know whether I'm stupid or not, but where have the official PNG and SVG logo files gone? Regards -- Chris Jones Photographic Imaging Professional and Graphic Designer ABN: 98 317 740 240 Photo Resolutio

new artwork difficult to discern active window

Under the old clearlooks, the active window had a different titlebar color than inactive windows. As much as I like the new color combo in lucid, it's difficult to use it because everything is too similar between inactive and active windows. I can't tell you how many times I've already closed t

Re: artwork

On 10/25/2009 10:19 PM, Dustin Kirkland wrote: > First, before sending an email criticizing aesthetics, I would pass my > own text through a spell checker and carefully examine the format of > the composition. Questioning the messenger instead of the message is a logical fallacy. :P -- Ubuntu-

Re: artwork

Op zondag 25-10-2009 om 20:55 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Shentino: > I didn't notice the artwork problem myself until after that date, as > I'm not normally one to jump straight on the development version. > Having only one box and not enough beef to run a VM kinda makes me

Re: artwork

Schedule I didn't notice the artwork problem myself until after that date, as I'm not normally one to jump straight on the development version. Having only one box and not enough beef to run a VM kinda makes me beta shy. However, I would hope that a new version of the splash screen

Re: artwork

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:18 PM, coz DS wrote: > Hey guys, >   I had been on the art team for a number of years. > I am really surprised that some of the artwork,  ie,,,boot splash  and > splash screen with progress bar  , were able to be considered let alone > actually used. >

Re: artwork

On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 19:33 -0400, Martin Owens wrote: > Lets not call for people to be fired just yet, I'm sure things can be > improved with some community involvement and a little unmooding of the > style. There was a call for concepts from the designers at Canonical to th

Re: artwork

Well I won't be quite so angsty about it but I will share my two cents. When I saw the plain white logo at the bottom when I upgraded in place to karmic beta, I was very surprised. Actually, surprised is mild. I honestly thought that the lame artwork was a bug of some sort. Consid

Re: artwork

to iconify instead of illustrate and that's reflected in my styles. Is there an art team? much like the technical board? Regards, Martin On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 19:18 -0400, coz DS wrote: > Hey guys, > I had been on the art team for a number of years. > I am really surprised that

artwork

Hey guys, I had been on the art team for a number of years. I am really surprised that some of the artwork, ie,,,boot splash and splash screen with progress bar , were able to be considered let alone actually used. I have to tell you that that the choices for these images and colours are

Re: Artwork / packagefreeze exception request

ade file is just a modified version > of the current default. > > I'm asking for a freeze break for this simply because it is a > non-intrusive change that makes Ubuntu look better. Besides my being > an idiot and missing the artwork / betafreeze, are there any good > reason