Re: Why and why.

2010-05-02 Thread William Grant
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 18:25 +0200, Jan Claeys wrote: > Op zondag 02-05-2010 om 19:38 uur [tijdzone +1000], schreef William > Grant: > > But they didn't have to do the first stage in an LTS that people will > > be using for three years. > > The first stage was done in Ubuntu 9.10 of course... > >

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-02 Thread Jan Claeys
Op zondag 02-05-2010 om 19:38 uur [tijdzone +1000], schreef William Grant: > But they didn't have to do the first stage in an LTS that people will > be using for three years. The first stage was done in Ubuntu 9.10 of course... (And maybe some fixes from 10.10 can be backported to 10.04.x?) --

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-02 Thread William Grant
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 09:59 +0800, Christopher Lees wrote: > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:00 +0100, George Farris wrote: > > > > Wait just a bit. The problem is that the notification area is a poor > > > replacement of the window list. Instead of big strips with an icon and > > > a title, it's just a

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Kjell Le
And then we have the debian way... :) On 2 May 2010 06:38, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:15 -0700, George Farris wrote: > >> Well then IMHO it should probably have been left at the old behavior >> until it was ready.  Why totally mess people up with something they have >>

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:15 -0700, George Farris wrote: > Well then IMHO it should probably have been left at the old behavior > until it was ready. Why totally mess people up with something they have > been doing for "years"? It seems an odd and very broken decision > process. Just sayin! > T

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Christopher Lees
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:00 +0100, George Farris wrote: > > Wait just a bit. The problem is that the notification area is a poor > > replacement of the window list. Instead of big strips with an icon and > > a title, it's just a tiny icon. And that icon even has arbitrary > > behavior. The idea is

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Luke L
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, George Farris wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 20:58 +0200, Remco wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 20:45, Chandru wrote: >> > It is proposed that from 11.04 the notification area (which allows actions >> > like opening the window with single click and pausing with

Re: Why and why.

2010-04-30 Thread George Farris
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 20:58 +0200, Remco wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 20:45, Chandru wrote: > > It is proposed that from 11.04 the notification area (which allows actions > > like opening the window with single click and pausing with middle click) > > will be replaced entirely with indicator a

Re: Why and why.

2010-04-30 Thread Remco
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 20:45, Chandru wrote: > It is proposed that from 11.04 the notification area (which allows actions > like opening the window with single click and pausing with middle click) > will be replaced entirely with indicator applet .  So just get used to > clicking more if you cont

Re: Why and why.

2010-04-30 Thread John Moser
Sorry for top post. The client in android 1.5 sucks. Why not get rid of rhythnbox's stupid behavior? It seems since 10.04 it has STARTED IN TRAY, and I have to restore it from its tray icon to get at the UI. Why not actually load with the window visible? On Apr 30, 2010 2:46 PM, "Chandru" wro

Re: Why and why.

2010-04-30 Thread Chandru
All icons of default applications are moved from notification area to indicator applet. This applet ensures that you don't perform any action on the icon other than clicking it. It is proposed that from 11.04 the notification area (which allows actions like opening the window with single click an

Re: Why and why.

2010-04-30 Thread John Moser
Rhythmbox minimizing to tray was always a broken design decision. They just made it more broken. We have virtual desktops. Why is the notification area being used as an alternate UI and a way to remove a window from the task tray? On Apr 30, 2010 2:39 PM, "George Farris" wrote: HI all, I jus

Why and why.

2010-04-30 Thread George Farris
HI all, I just upgraded to 10.04 and Rhythmbox is all messed up. Why oh why when it was working perfectly does some one who presumable never used it messes it all up. First you can no longer click on the icon in the panel and have the app toggle to window mode and then back to an icon. Also one