Re: Ubuntu without polkit

2013-04-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> Hello Kevin, > > Kevin Chadwick [2013-04-06 1:12 +0100]: > > If you really wanted to do that you would find the likes of Selinux, > > RBAC, TOMOYO and apparmor more effective, useful to a user and less of > > a risk, however they do not save you from writing bad code and sudo > > encourages the

Re: Ubuntu without polkit

2013-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Kevin, Kevin Chadwick [2013-04-06 1:12 +0100]: > If you really wanted to do that you would find the likes of Selinux, > RBAC, TOMOYO and apparmor more effective, useful to a user and less of > a risk, however they do not save you from writing bad code and sudo > encourages the best of that

Re: Ubuntu without polkit

2013-04-05 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:39:30 -0400 Phillip Susi wrote: > > I have decided that sudo is superior to polkit in every way for > > both developers and user except for if developers want to be lazy > > and outsource policy creation to more general and so less specific > > and so obviously likely less

Re: Ubuntu without polkit

2013-04-05 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/31/2013 7:28 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > I have decided that sudo is superior to polkit in every way for > both developers and user except for if developers want to be lazy > and outsource policy creation to more general and so less specific >

Ubuntu without polkit

2013-03-31 Thread Kevin Chadwick
I have decided that sudo is superior to polkit in every way for both developers and user except for if developers want to be lazy and outsource policy creation to more general and so less specific and so obviously likely less secure ones. I do not wish to debate that and all debates I have seen ha