On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:25 PM Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:20, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> >
> > On my system, if the initrd isn't readable by the kernel, it results
> > in a kernel panic. Is that to be expected despite inird-less boot? Or
> > is that an indicator
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:20, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
>
> On my system, if the initrd isn't readable by the kernel, it results
> in a kernel panic. Is that to be expected despite inird-less boot? Or
> is that an indicator that at least Lubuntu (and probably Ubuntu
> Desktop) does use an initrd?
On 8/9/22 19:08, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 17:53, Richard Laager wrote:
On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at
all.
What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an
Bah, sent directly to a Canonical employee rather than a mailing list.
Why does Gmail keep doing this? grr...
-- Forwarded message -
From: Aaron Rainbolt
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: Ubuntu initramfs (Was: Re: any reason for CONFIG_FUSE_FS=y)
To: Dimitri John
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 17:53, Richard Laager wrote:
>
> On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at
> > all.
>
> What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an
> initrd.img-KERNEL_VERSION in /boot.
On 8/9/22 11:38, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
The fast majority of Ubuntu installations boot without initramfs at
all.
What makes you say this? Every Ubuntu system I've ever installed has an
initrd.img-KERNEL_VERSION in /boot. In this context, I'm talking about
systems installed using the stock
