Re: The non-evil graphics card

2008-06-25 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:07:05PM +1000, Christopher Halse Rogers wrote: >> On 6/25/08, Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > probably some of you already read that statement of kernel developers >> > about th

Re: The non-evil graphics card

2008-06-25 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:07:05PM +1000, Christopher Halse Rogers wrote: > On 6/25/08, Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > probably some of you already read that statement of kernel developers > > about the opening of graphics drivers: > www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Kernel_Driver_Statem

Re: The non-evil graphics card

2008-06-25 Thread Christopher Halse Rogers
On 6/25/08, Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > probably some of you already read that statement of kernel developers > about the opening of graphics drivers: www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Kernel_Driver_Statement> > > Currently I'm using Intel's integrated graphics (G965, G3

The non-evil graphics card

2008-06-24 Thread Markus Hitter
Hello all, probably some of you already read that statement of kernel developers about the opening of graphics drivers: Currently I'm using Intel's integrated graphics (G965, G31), but I'm about to upgrade to a "real" graphics card. Which vendor should I prefer (or stay with the G31) in ord