Re: The Case For Re-Evaluating Our Release Approach To FFMPEG

2008-09-12 Thread Null Ack
2008/9/10 Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Null Ack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Summary : I think we need to have regular snapshots of svn ffmpeg, >> libavcodec and so forth released in both the current development build >> and as backports to production builds. User's expect to have

Re: The Case For Re-Evaluating Our Release Approach To FFMPEG

2008-09-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
"Null Ack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Summary : I think we need to have regular snapshots of svn ffmpeg, > libavcodec and so forth released in both the current development build > and as backports to production builds. User's expect to have video > experiences atleast as good as Windows and Mac

Re: The Case For Re-Evaluating Our Release Approach To FFMPEG

2008-09-09 Thread (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
Olá Null e a todos. On Tuesday 09 September 2008 05:56:45 Null Ack wrote: > Summary : I think we need to have regular snapshots of svn ffmpeg, > libavcodec and so forth released in both the current development build > and as backports to production builds. User's expect to have video > experiences

The Case For Re-Evaluating Our Release Approach To FFMPEG

2008-09-08 Thread Null Ack
Gday everyone, It was suggested to me on IRC that I should discuss this matter on this mail list. Summary : I think we need to have regular snapshots of svn ffmpeg, libavcodec and so forth released in both the current development build and as backports to production builds. User's expect to have